Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Looney "Lonetree Declaration". The haters are converging on my city

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:03 PM
Original message
The Looney "Lonetree Declaration". The haters are converging on my city
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_15462680

Bachmann, Malkin, toe-sucker Dick Morris, Tom Tancredo, the craziest of the crazies are coming to Denver to provide the "intellectual ammunition" to undo Obama's efforts since taking office in January 2009. They're expecting about 400 attendees and all are asked to sign the following declaration..

The Lone Tree Declaration

Participants at the Western Conservative Summit this weekend will be asked to sign the declaration, which says in part:

Our signatures on this declaration . . . affirm six tenets of who we are and what we stand for:

1. In our adherence to the self-evident truths of the American Founding, we are conservatives.

2. In our debt to the civilizational heritage of Jerusalem, Athens, Rome, London, and Philadelphia, we are Westerners.

3. In our concern for the mounting threat to liberty, seeing freedom in the balance, we convene with solemn purpose at this Summit.

4. We seek a conservative renewal for our country through civic action that puts principle above party, resists the corruption of power, bridges intramural disagreements or rivalries, and protects an open public square centered on the nation's Judeo-Christian core.

5. We commit ourselves unswervingly to a political and social order that upholds individual freedom and personal responsibility, limited government and the rule of law, free enterprise and private property, traditional family values and sanctity of life, compassion for the poor and voluntarism in service to others, natural law and morality, strong defense and secure borders, all in keeping with the original intent of the Constitution.

6. We reject, and will resist, the socialist temptation, transnational progressivism, secular utopian illusions, appeasement, disarmament, or capitulation to jihad and sharia.Source: Western Conservative Summit


I'm just glad I didn't get a call to set up and work the show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another day another white conservative manifesto.
:hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am so sick of hearing that 'personal responsibility' crap
I shall rant elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why, yes of course...all the American founders were conservative
That's why we're all still subjects of the British Monarchy. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, at least it sounds like they support saving one tree.
I mean, isn't that a major concession to tree huggers?

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do they always ask people to sign these canned "declarations"?
What if you disagree with a point or two? Are you asked to leave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. If the Founding Father's were conservatives (stick with status quo) we'd still
be subjects to Elizabeth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuegii Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does number three actually qualify as a "tenet"?
As I read it, they're "concerned" and plan to "convene with solemn purpose," which is more of a notification of intent to hold a meeting, rather than trying to articulate a set of principles, or beliefs or a doctrine.
On the other hand, screeching nonsense without offering solutions has worked fairly well for the 'Baggers so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC