Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush*'s tax cuts are still in effect and there is no hiring going on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:39 AM
Original message
Bush*'s tax cuts are still in effect and there is no hiring going on
How is keeping them in effect permanently going to create hiring? We have people on both sides of the aisle saying "you can't raise taxes during a recession". Clinton did exactly that and America experienced "The greatest economic expansion in history" Clinton gave a tax break to middle class and increased taxes for those making over four hundred thousand a year. Our economy took off and left the Bush 1 recession in the dust..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unemployment in my county went from 14.3 to 10.4
In one year. We're moving in the right direction. We need more of Obama's transportation and energy programs to kick in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. The message should be rung loud and clear: Tax cuts for the rich don't create jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. How can that be??? Really. How can that possibly be?
The Democrats are in power now. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. tax cuts and increases don't affect hiring as much as
uncertainty about upcoming cuts or increases, and uncertainty about other things. Most places I've worked (small to huge) look at the cost of a new higher 3+ years down the road. The first year matters, but there's extra cost for onboarding (HR, security, headhunter's cut, equipment, training,...), and less productivity because of the learning curve for the new hire. As a manager I have to eat those costs the first year but that's ok if the employee stays for a few years. That means I need to budget for that employee's cost over at least a few years.

If I don't know the multi-year costs, it's harder to justify a new hire. I don't want to have to fire anyone because taxes reduced our budget or health care increased employee cost beyond our budget.

If I think costs may go up significantly I need to offer a smaller salary so I have some in reserve in my budget for future years. And offering a small salary is likely to make that employee leave sooner so there's a risk that I won't recoup my upfront costs. So it's much better to wait until the results of the health insurance reform are better know. And until I know what's going on with Bush's tax cuts. And what's going on with the energy bill (if it costs more to operate our plants then company profits are down and my budget is likely to be cut). And if I were at a small company now I'd have to worry about going over the thresholds that trigger new health care regulations.

Temp workers and outsourcing are a much better option when future costs and taxes are in doubt. Even known high taxes and high benefit costs are better than unknowns when it comes to permanent employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't know what type of business you work in but
If it has anything at all to do with sales, you want people to have money. The best way for that is for middle class expenses to go down while expenses for those that would hardly notice to go up. Most businesses have pretty static expenses. They pretty much are the same, every month, rent, lights, heat, wages, fuel, etc. The main thing to improve bottom line is to either sell more goods or raise prices. Cutting expenses are a factor but a small one. New taxes are quite negligible and are more than made up for if you sell more product which would happen if regular people had more money. When all the money accumulates at the very top, there isn't a lot of room for advancement..Tax the shit out of the very wealthy and you will see business boom like never before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC