Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clintons Expected To Buy 20-Acre Farm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:12 PM
Original message
Clintons Expected To Buy 20-Acre Farm
Former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are reportedly giving up their fancy Chappaqua home for a faux-rustic farm in the even pricier Bedford Hills area.

It is believed that the Clintons have settled on a 7,000 square-foot property called Clover Hill Farm.

The 20-acre estate features a wine cellar, a heated pool, an artist's studio, and a horse stable. The house itself contains 5 bedrooms and 6 1/2 bathrooms.

The property is listed for $10.9 million by Coldwell Banker.



More photos at link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/15/clintons-expected-to-buy_n_647272.html#s114374

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for them. Must be nice.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who gets to clear the brush, Bill or Hillary?
Oh Hillary gets to sweep the porch, so it must be Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. nice place.
really nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nice.
Meanwhile, I'll struggle to make mortgage payments on an old, run-down, falling-apart mobile home.

And others will struggle to make rent, or lose their homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Are you faulting the Clintons for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They bear a portion of the blame.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 12:31 PM by LWolf
For opening the door to neoliberal policies via the DLC.

Would more people be working, and fewer struggling, if there was no NAFTA?

But no, I'm not faulting them for more than that. Of course, the 10.7 million that place is going to cost them would certainly keep a lot of struggling people in more modest accommodations. The cost of upkeep every month alone would house some people, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Many (a whole lot) responses about this on an earlier
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 12:23 PM by Obamanaut
thread - some favorable, others not so much.

They have the money to do it, they assist via donations to various causes, they get money from speaking engagements, books, and maybe even presidential retirement pay, and SoS salary. More power to them.

I don't want a house that large, but they are nice to look at.

Link to earlier post http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=8723341
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. He can buy my neighbor's property cheap
She has 120 acres and she can't keep it up any longer since she just turned 75.

I sold her the acreage 20 some years ago and she and her husband built a home on it. She offered it to me but I can't afford to buy it back from her with the house, the barn, the corrals, etc.

I'd love to have Clinton as a neighbor. He'd probably put in a pool and have a bunch of young chicks around it every day. I could come over and swim and bs with him.

It's not quite as upscale as the one in the picture and it definitely isn't in as fashionable of a setting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Idle farmland
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nice looking place. It kind reminds me of their very first house, sitting about 4 blocks from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess if you compare it to Al Gore's 10,000 sf home or John Edwards
palatial spread of 29,000 square feet, the Clintons aren't living nearly as large as they could be.

And with none of the inconsistencies that go along with the having a home that consumes so much in electric and other power resources while you are asking others to go green and reduce their carbon footprint in Gore's case, or making the elimation of poverty your cause while you live in a palace sized home and grounds and complain about the unsightly mess down the road of some local who doesn't like you and lives in a trailer shack.

To each his own, but at least the Clintons don't seem to be sending any kind of a mixed message with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. So only saints should promote causes for good, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Don't know, don't care about saints or the like
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 05:26 PM by DeschutesRiver
Sounds like a religious thing, and I am not into that.

Inconsistency of behavior, as between these three couples, was what I was reflecting upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. In reflecting on your point regarding an individual's inconsistency
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 07:00 PM by DeschutesRiver
between his/her life conduct and the good cause he/she supports, I've seen quite a few examples where inconsistent behavior has had a detrimental effect on a good cause, and Edwards might be one example.

He ran to serve as our President, and made much of his solid marriage and family life as he promoted his candidacy. Voters were not only pleased that he was a loyal married man of long standing, but a man who showed that he would not break a commitment even when the going got tough when his wife became terminally ill. I remember when it was revealed that he'd been having an affair, and the reaction even here at DU to his deception, where it was perceived to have been a convenient lie to garner votes, when in reality, his actions might have tipped the election to the repubs had he been the candidate.

And then people further began to consider other things, such as his lavish lifesyle, his activities such as joining a hedge fund, and even a bit about his reluctance during the campaign to be stuck talking to lowlifes at fair events, and questions arose as to the sincerity of his beliefs with regard to the people he claimed to be devoted to helping. And concerns about whether loyal supporters' donations had been used to fund his affair. And further discussion of whether his alleged devotion to the cause of poverty was nothing more than a scam similar to his use of his marriage as a prop to win sympathy from those who regarded him as a good guy because of it. I watched it snowball until his credibility went into the tank, and support for him, and his individual efforts for his good cause became non-existent.

Many people felt betrayed, and many wrote him off. Which I would suspect had quite a negative effect on his ability to be effective with regard to his good cause. People will still support the issue which was the focus of his good cause; however, it is unlikely that they will support his efforts in this regard. So I am thinking that under the right circumstances and conditions, yes, inconsistency of this kind between someone's personal life and their good cause can potentially so hamper their effectiveness as to be detrimental, instead of useful.

Should it matter? I don't know. Can it? Yep, and there are many other examples out there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Geezie Peezie I sure hope Bill doesn't get and urge
to cut brush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. And half a mule?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, that's a nice looking spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC