Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do you feel about the term "Cat Food Commission" being used for the Deficit Commission ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:30 PM
Original message
Poll question: How do you feel about the term "Cat Food Commission" being used for the Deficit Commission ?
If you don't know what it refers to here is an article that explains it:

Deficit Commission Co-Chair: Social Security T-Bills Have "Been Used"

June 18, 2010
-- by Dave Johnson

http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2010/06/deficit_commiss.htm

......The Commission: Now there is the Deficit Commission looking into how to raise money to cover what the government handed out as tax cuts to the rich. Rather than get the money from where the money went, the plutocrats are instead trying to convince people that it would make more sense to just cut Social Security instead, so they don't have to pay it back. The commission is meeting in secret, preparing to recommend cutting Social Security benefits. Hence the nickname for the Commission: "Cat food Commission," because cutting Social Security would force as many as 1.5 million old people into poverty and eating cat food for dinner because it costs less.

(more at link)
.....................

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't catfood cost more than flake tuna (or mackerel), sugar, and canola oil?
Calorie for calorie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perhaps, I think it is the anology of the cat food and not the cost but you are probably right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A former college student on a budget would know
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 05:39 PM by Oregone
I would of tried catfood if I had to. :) Eating bones, skin and guts in mackerel got the job done instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It is a common story going back to, at least, the 50's, as I recall...
The story is that the poor, unable to afford better, ate cat food. This was at a time before the gourmet cat food craze swept the nation, and cat food was cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. think kibble nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yuck. Dry catfood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
59. I never thought Morris the cat posted on DU!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. not unless you're buying premium brands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
55. We're talking DRY cat food here.
Maybe even melamine added dry dog food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. When the Tax Cuts for the Rich didn't produce the jobs Reagan promised....
He had Greenspan slap a regressive flat tax (FICA increase) on the working poor to address the then-record deficits.

Obvious Just Solution: Restore the top rates to what they were before Reagan and use the money to pay back the trust fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cat food ain't cheap... maybe the dollar store commision. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. It makes me ignore the poster's words
I just unrec and hide any post where that moronic expression is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Prices a can of Friskies lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. 40 cents for the 5 oz can.
Or you can buy a 32 pack for $13.

Mmm...the Turkey and Giblets flavor smells pretty good but not even the cats will eat Country Supper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Whatever you do, do NOT try the Kidneys and Cream.
Gawd, that crap was awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. If you bought 32 cans individually
they would cost $12.80
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. I find it quite silly and childish....
and using it does not lead to any substantive discussion, it actually misdirects the debate from the Commission itself to a debate about the use of "Cat food Commission", imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. It makes me Chuckles.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hot Plate Heaven at the Green Hotel
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 07:16 PM by 90-percent
From a mid eighties Zappa album, Broadway the Hard Way


I used to have a job
An' I was doin' very well
Depression came along
An' everybody start to yell
'where'd they go, them good ol' days,
'an all that crap we used to sell? '
Now I'm in hot-plate heaven,
At the green hotel

Republicans is fine,
If you're a multi-millionaire
Democrats is fair,
If all you own is what you wear
Neither of 'em's really right,
'cause neither of 'em care
'bout that hot-plate heaven,
'cause they ain't been there

They really oughta go
'n find out how the hall-way smell --
They'd benefit to know
'bout what the bums in there could tell
(of course we're only dreamin',
But I s'pose it's just as well
That's all you get to dream
Up in the green hotel)

Nature didn't put me here
An' neither did my fate --
It musta been some evil ol'
Republican candidate!
He's over here in washington,
But I wish he was in hell
'cause I'm in hot-plate heaven
At the green hotel

Things is slightly better now;
They hope we will forget
The misery of 'trickle down',
An' jelly-bean etiquette
The regal presidential style
Has simply not worn well,
An' neither has my rags,
Up in the green hotel

"pass the dog food" is the last line, included in alternate versions

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think it's stupid and I immediately discount anyone that uses it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's an accurate term
If the recommendations are enacted, catfood consumption WILL rise.

I'm sure the pet food lobby is in on this one, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it's an extremely apt term..
And I automatically discount the opinion of anyone who uses the "official" name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. +1 though I'll listen to see if they don't spout decades old Reich wing talking points (as usual)
before dismissing their cockamamie nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. +2
*someone* is afraid the term may be too effective...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
49. +3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
50. ++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Accurate and appropriate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's a helluva lot more appropriate than the Department of "Defense". K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think the reality is ALREADY here in some poorer communities
With all those people on UI, lower sales taxes coming into communities - perhaps the seniors may not be at that point, but if foodbanks run low (or people are too proud to ask for help) I truly think we already HAVE a portion of the populace at the *catfood* subsistence level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. Food banks are already running low.
I used to get 4-5 full bags of groceries at the foodbank, now I get 1-2 that aren't filled up at all. And there aren't any fresh foods anymore, just canned. There also used to be a lot of day old bread, but stores have found they can sell the day old so they aren't giving it to the shelters now.

And there are a lot more people showing up, not just the regulars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. I know, we used to have to use foodbanks
I noticed the quality and quantity was going down when we were still going, just a few months ago. We stopped going to one entirely, because a bag they gave us was infested with bugs, and some of the canned stuff was past the date of use.

With 38 people a minute losing benefits it's going to get UGLY out there. And if there isn't any real help for those folks come winter? I don't really want to think of how bad it WILL get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't like it.
I prefer to call it "The Commission That Is Bound And Determined To Screw Us Out Of Every Single Dime We Ever Paid Into Social Security And Medicare Instead Of Raising Taxes On The Rich And Making Them Pay Us Back Since That's Where The Money Went In The First Place."

OK, maybe that's a little long.

I guess "Cat Food Commission" is more succinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Ka-booom!
:applause: :applause: :applause:

I prefer to call it "The Commission That Is Bound And Determined To Screw Us Out Of Every Single Dime We Ever Paid Into Social Security And Medicare Instead Of Raising Taxes On The Rich And Making Them Pay Us Back Since That's Where The Money Went In The First Place."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. That was priceless! Thank you! ROFL..
:rofl: :yoiks: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Well done
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. +1000
That was priceless :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. I call it the Alpo bailout commission
The Banks and the insurance companies got bailouts now it is time Alpo and Purina to get theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Deep but true! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. i like that one as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
61. Alpo is too expensive. How about Snappy Dog Food Commission?
Snappy even sold horse meat as dog food back years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. I love it. Didn't realize there was an issue for using that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Some people here are trying to impose Newspeak on the board
Newspeak is a fictional language in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The term was also used to discuss Soviet phraseology.<1> In the novel by Orwell, it is described as being "the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year". Orwell included an essay about it in the form of an appendix<2> in which the basic principles of the language are explained. Newspeak is closely based on English but has a greatly reduced and simplified vocabulary and grammar. This suits the totalitarian regime of the Party, whose aim is to make any alternative thinking—"thoughtcrime", or "crimethink" in the newest edition of Newspeak—impossible by removing any words or possible constructs which describe the ideas of freedom, rebellion and so on. One character, Syme, says admiringly of the shrinking volume of the new dictionary: "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Then those people need to get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. did you call?
I love words like "clean air initiative" and "the forest preservation initiative" and how about the "clean energy initiative?" And, really WAR is PEACE, got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. By their posts, you shall know them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. Very accurate, especially considering the people who are on
Edited on Fri Jul-16-10 12:02 AM by sabrina 1
Commission. Alan Simpson eg, who calls elderly people 'old geezers' who, he once said, were greedy because they didn't want to give up part of their SS for some Republican policy or another. He also refers to working Americans as 'the lesser people'. He reveals his sense of superiority. They believe they are better than the American people. So to their way of thinking, the SS fund should be in the hands of their buddies on Wall St. to gamble with. Letting it go to the people who paid into it, is just a crime, as far as these Republicans are concerned.

They have zero concept of the struggle many of the elderly have just to provide themselves with food, nor do they care.

I don't know why these people are on this Commission. They are known enemies of SS and care nothing for the poor, the disabled or the elderly. To Simpson's way of thinking, if you can't afford to eat when you're old, it's your own fault. 'Let them eat cat food'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. Bravo - You hit the bull's eye! And of course there's Mr. Peterson who is the leader of the pack...
Billionaire Pete Peterson's Quest to 'Reform' Social Security: Follow the (His) Money
Category: Bidness • Conservatives • Social Security
Posted on: March 29, 2010 9:53 AM, by Mike

http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2010/03/billionaire_pete_petersons_que.php

...One of the key figures and bankrollers in that attempt is financier Peter Peterson. By key, I mean that he has spent around one billion dollars financing the Peterson Foundation, which advocates various 'fiscal responsibility' measures (i.e., making Granny eat cat food) and slashing Social Security benefits*. But as always, one must follow the money, since Peterson's 'charity' seems rather self-interested--and not in the sense of 'healthy children are good for all of us' (italics mine):

...we can get a sense of what is on the table by looking at the earlier agenda of Peterson's Commission on Budget Reform. The Peterson/Walker plan would have slashed social security entitlements at a time when Wall Street has destroyed the home equity and private retirement accounts of potential retirees. Worse, it would have increased the Social Security tax, disguised as a "mandatory savings tax." This added tax would be automatically withdrawn from your paycheck and deposited to a "Guaranteed Retirement Account" managed by the Social Security Administration. Since the savings would be "mandatory," you could not withdraw your money without stiff penalties; and rather than enjoying an earlier retirement paid out of your increased savings, a later retirement date was being called for. In the meantime, your "mandatory savings" would just be fattening the investment pool of the Wall Street bankers managing the funds.

(More at link)

...............

And so it goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. Yes, thanks for the link. The man is a total enemy of
the elderly, the disabled and the poor. What I would like to know is why are these people constantly showing up on these commisssions? Who elected them? And why are there no ordinary people asked to participate? Do you have to be a billionaire now to have any say in this country?

And wasn't Obama supposed to change all this? The same cast of greedy characters seem to show up no matter which party the people elect. I don't know what we can do about it, but it's clear that what we did do, was not the solution after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #48
60. Sabrina I found your question intriguing and researched more into it - here's what I found...
This Week: Obama’s Deficit Commission – or Pete Peterson’s?
By Roger Hickey
April 24, 2010 - 7:11pm ET

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010041624/week-obama-s-deficit-commission-or-pete-peterson-s

On Wednesday Wall Street multibillionaire Peter G. Peterson, who has pledged to spend a billion dollars to panic Americans about deficits in order to get them to slash Social Security and Medicare, is conducting a “Fiscal Summit” in Washington featuring many of the very people who created the deficits Peterson decries.

This summit is designed to stampede President Obama’s new deficit commission (which meets for the first time the day before – on Tuesday) into adopting their version of fiscal austerity.

....Americans looking for jobs and economic recovery are not likely to be persuaded by the bizarre collection of speakers Peterson has assembled.

President Bush's tax cuts for the very wealthy were the first cause of soaring U.S. deficits after Democrats cleaned up the red ink of the Reagan years. So who are Peterson’s headliners?

Alan Greenspan, former Fed Chairman, who famously assured Congress that those deficit-creating tax cuts were OK – and who was recently forced to admit that his conservative blinders prevented him from seeing and acting to avoid the housing bubble and the deficit-creating economic crash that resulted.

Other speakers, like Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), supported the Bush tax cuts. And Peterson himself, who benefited hugely from the Bush tax changes, never seriously protested those irresponsible deficit-creating policies.

Also speaking: Robert Rubin, who as Clinton’s Treasury secretary presided over the deregulation of Wall Street financial giants and then as Citigroup chairman presided over the orgy of speculation and outright fraud (all enabled by his Treasury policies) that brought the financial system crashing down.

(more at link)

...............

I found this very interesting! Take a look at the entire article. Thanks for bringing up the question, I learned a lot from it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
54. I would say we should start sending Simpson cheap ass cat food
but that sort of an undertaking would be better for our overflowing animal shelters. What about sending him cat turds? I've got plenty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
56.  Cat turds is what they deserve but might be illegal
could be considered hazardous waste. It would be cheaper and easier to save and mail them our pet food labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
43. It's a defining term, and a poster's reaction to it determine's if s/he is actually a Democrat.
Those who sneer at the term should be tombstoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Jim you and I think alike - I was amazed at some of the reaction I got about it. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Very well put, about the reaction
of people to it ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. Yep. It's like Phenolphtalein. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
44. It's short, accurate, and to the point.
Edited on Fri Jul-16-10 06:45 AM by JoeyT
Though I've been calling it "The Ramen Noodle Committee" too.
Ramen's cheaper than cat food. It's probably far less healthy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. It's purrfect.
Sorry for that one.

But it really is the best label you can give it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
58. it is appropriate
describing fucktards who will obviously protect the rich and target EVERYONE ELSE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
62. I love cats and wouldn't feed them low-quality food, so the term has never bothered me a bit
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 12:06 PM by slackmaster
MEOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC