Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about home prices and foreclosures

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:47 PM
Original message
Question about home prices and foreclosures
So I was listening to Marketplace this afternoon and whatever analyst was on said,

"As home prices continue to fall, you will naturally see more foreclosures..."

and, like I normally do when I'm listening to NPR, I nodded in an attempt to look wise. But then I had one of those double take moments and I realized that doesn't make sense at all.

Why would the amount someone is currently willing to pay for a house more or less like mine have anything to do with my ability to make my mortgage payment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. People will stop paying on mortages when there is no chance of ever
seeing home values appreciate to more than what the mortgage is. Technically this is a default but hey, it's NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Crap. So the "bum homeowner" thing has some truth behind it? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. WTF is a "bum homeowner"?
You mean someone who makes a sound fiscal decision? They are a bum? A lowlife?

Poor banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It *can* be sound, or it can be the same groupthink that made you buy too high
Losing all your equity in most cases is not going to be better than holding on to a place to live (saving on rent), your credit, and the possibility of reselling for more in a decade or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. "Losing all your equity"
You are presuming a homeowner has any. :)

They may not, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Everyone without an interest-only loan has *some* equity
I mean, assuming you've made at least one payment that ate into principal at all. It's just not enough to cover your debt with after the house is liquidated. But it's something, that can eventually turn into something more, particularly when the next housing bubble rolls around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "particularly when the next housing bubble rolls around"
I assert that keeping an underwater home in the hopes of selling it in the next bubble is insane. To each their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:17 PM
Original message
Actually, people making over a million a year are the one most likely to walk away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many people are trying to hold on long enough to be able to sell
their house, but are really struggling with their mortgage payments. At some point, these people will either have to give up or will feel hopeless. The longer this goes, and the farther the prices fall, the less hope these people have to get out without going to foreclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. See, I've only ever been able to afford to rent
So I guess the idea of expecting to get anything out of what I pay for housing seems so incredibly privileged to me that I can't imagine being upset about that being shut off for a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. I can understand your view, but there is more to it. Home ownership
comes with home maintenance costs, and if you have not had a raise in years, and other expenses keep going up, or if you have lost a job (or lost a second income), you just keep putting all you have into the house (and still don't keep up with all that is needed). People are not even looking to get anything out of the house today, but if you will end up having to pay tens of thousands of dollars just to sell the house because that is what you still owe over the value of the house, you just have to walk away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why would your ability to make the mortgage payment have much to do with...
the fiscal sense of doing so (on the other hand, I understand your inability would come into play in that decision)?

If you are upside down, you are upside down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You're upside down on your car the second you drive it off the lot
What does that have to do with anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. If your car has value beyond the sticker price (such as work transportation), its to be considered
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 06:28 PM by Oregone
If you can ride a bike to work and to the store, by all means....


Just as such, a home has value beyond its market worth, but that same utility can be found in a rental. Part of the fiscal equation should include the cost of renting compared to the cost of paying a mortgage on an upside down piece of real estate. People aren't just paying down principle they can recoup later perhaps, being that it will be equity. They may be paying interest on a value far exceeding the real worth of the home (And perhaps more than what itll ever be in some reasonably finite period of time). Paying interest on $600K when your home is only worth $300K may be ridiculous. By the time the loan is paid off, you may pay over $700K in interests, and you may have no idea if the home is even worth $600K again at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because the value of the house is less than what they owe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And?
By that logic nobody should pay for their cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. You would keep paying off a $1M loan on a car that is worth $250,000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Id ride a bike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. A large number of people have been spending a lot of their income
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 06:17 PM by jtuck004
to sustain more bills than they can now pay. As average income has dropped, sometimes losing the $5K a year job and picking one up that is $20K, sometimes losing the second income in the home, and 30+ million people found themselves unemployed they have turned to their assets to get money - such as a 2nd mortgage or refinancing their home. But that money is no longer there, because there are so many homes available, which has dropped in price, credit is tight, their credit rating is no longer what it was, etc. There are also those who are upside down, a separate issue.

Then they kill their 401K or the small amounts of stock or cash they have.

So in a convoluted way that drop in home value is causing some people (not you, perhaps)to no longer be able to afford their bills, and they lose their home.

This is happening to thousands of people because of an interesting quirk of human nature. They resist change, even when it is slapping them across the face. The day things change they should divest themselves of all the liabilities they can and get their home on the market - but they don't. They keep thinking things are going to get better, bolstered by the crap being put out by talking heads and the government, and when things finally cave in, they still don't believe it.

And in a cruel circle of fate, the inverse of the statement above, that foreclosures are dropping home prices, is also true. And may well be what the reporter should have said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I totally understand that, but I don't see how a lower home price affects the situation
My home price doesn't change my income or my obligations, as far as I can tell.

(Now, I know there are some mortgages where the interest rate gets jacked way the hell up if you're underwater, that obviously makes sense. But I had thought those were very very rare even in the old days.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. But if one's job changes, and they turn to their home for money, and

the price is down so they can't borrow (as millions of Americans have done for the past 20 or so years) they can lose their home.

Maybe not you. But all around you. And as that happens, it might change your income one of these days. You might be adept enough to change, (if you can, some debts are not all that easily changed), but time will tell.

Maybe you could email the NPR reporter and get a better explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Not me? Buying a house has never been remotely in my league
And the idea of actually getting to keep even some of the money I spend on housing, even if it's years in the future, seems like such a good deal I get a little pissed off when people complain that their magic spigot of money is shut off for a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Pissed off at who?

The little guy with the 130K, or 200K home who can't make enough to have a little extra money to send the kids to college, or who finally thinks they deserve a nice car after 20 years of putting up with his jerkball boss, or to pay for the operations that the health insurance company won't cover, or to pay for his parents who are trying to live on $1300 a month after the county raised their taxes on their home and they had to move, and the only rentals available were $1300 a month, food not included?

Or the 1% of the population that has 83% of the assets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm going to actually answer your question:
It doesn't. Your ability to pay your mortgage has nothing to do with how much someone is willing to pay for a home like yours.

To explain what was stated on NPR, as lenders foreclose many are taking far less than what is owed once they take possession because the market is flooded and at times the abandoned/vacant homes are gutted. Short sales aren't helping either. Then, because people are generally idiots in instances like this, someone sees the house next door just like theirs sell for $60,000 post foreclosure but they owe $175,000 on ultimately the same house, they figure they'll walk away because they're upside down on their loan. You know, the same folks that are upside down on their car loan, the shoes they charged, etc. They walk away, lender forecloses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. So it's the kind of groupthink that ensures you'll buy high and sell low
I hate this species sometimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. You are welcome to buck this trend by paying a hefty sum for my home I have for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. There's a lot of "suggestion" out there to do just this.
I've read articles and posts right here on DU telling folks to walk away from their mortgages for this reason. What's moronic, is that people are doing it based on what the neighbor pays. Most folks would be really depressed if they knew that their neighbors who bought 20 years ago (as opposed to 20 days ago) paid $30k for the same house.

Moronic part #2, home values will eventually spring back. Might take 10 years, might take 15. Fact is, God's not making any more dirt, but we're sure upping the population.

As I said, if you didn't pay cash, and it's not an investment of some sort, you're upside down the minute you bought it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. I always wonder what the "walkaways" from underwater houses (the ones
who can still swing the payments without trouble) are walking TO. A better house? I assume most of them are the better-off who have options, own second homes and rental properties, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Perhaps a rental that costs far less monthly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Why do that when the mortgage payment is affordable? I'm not talking
about people who can't afford the monthly payment without a lot of cutting back, I'm talking about strategic defaulting because the investment has lost value. I have not actually known anybody who did that, but apparently it's all the rage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. The capital you saved can be invested to appreciate faster than the said property
It all gets a bit complicated when you consider in one scenario you are paying rental payments and potentially saving a lot that could be invested, and in another, mostly interest (depending on the length of time you are examining).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. an empty home on the block brings down the property value of the occupied
Also, as more people lose their homes, there is more on the market to sell. A glut of available housing means lower prices. I'm sure these are not the only reasons. But these are the first two off the top of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. During the bubble something like 20%
of the homes sold were bought as investment properties. I would like to
know how many of the homes people are walking away from are not
their primary residence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Probably quite a few, considering how many renters have reported they were locked out of homes
when the place they were renting was sold out from under them.

Problem with that is that in some states, if your second property gets forclosed on, they'll put a lien for the balance on your primary residence when they sell for under the value of the loan and forclose on that property, too. I read where a couple people with second or investment property in Florida had that happen to their paid for primary residences - one in another state.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. If you bought using some kind of insane ARM
If you bought using some kind of insane ARM, with the goal of refinancing as soon as the market produced equity in your house, you are massively screwed now. The whole sales gimmick on these hideous gotcha loans was that you could refinance before the reset. But now you can't because you owe more than the house is worth. And the same problem is moving in to commercial real estate. Fun, fun, fun.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC