Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pain Ray Recalled From Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:22 AM
Original message
Pain Ray Recalled From Afghanistan
Pain Ray Recalled From Afghanistan
By Noah Shachtman Email Author
July 20, 2010 | 11:09 am

The Danger Room family gets results! Several weeks ago, site co-founder Sharon Weinberger and I started pestering the military about the decision to send a microwave heat ray gun to Afghanistan. Blasting the locals with an invisible pain beam, we suggested, might not be the optimal way to promote trust in the Kabul and Washington governments.

The folks we spoke with at the International Security Assistance Force headquarters in Afghanistan seemed inclined to agree. (A spokesperson for the military’s Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, on the other hand, chose to quibble with our assertion that the so-called Active Denial System made people feel like they’re on fire. Wrong, wrong, wrong, she said: “It’s an intolerable heating sensation… Like opening up an oven door.”)

Well, now the so-called “Active Denial System” has been recalled. It’s headed back to America, without ever being fired in hostility. “The system will not be used here and is being sent back to the States,” ISAF spokesman Lt. Col. John Dorrian tells Engadget’s Sean Hollister.

Active Denial has long been considered the “Holy Grail” of crowd control, for its ability to penetrate just a 64th of an inch underneath the skin, and inspire people to move — fast — from the pain that ensued. To Active Denial’s boosters, that made the largely non-lethal weapon safer, more humane alternative to the M-16. But this counterinsurgency is, in many ways, a battle of perceptions. The system’s tactical advantages are far outweighed by the strategically-massive propaganda boost that the pain ray would’ve given the Taliban.



unhappycamper comment: Many things are more humane that the M-16. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. What better way to promote modernism among the fundamentalist Muslims than with...
...technology that causes extreme pain?

Good decision.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. it is too harsh for Afghans, so let's redeploy in the US.
Yeah, that's about right. I am happy for the Afghans, but as for the rest of it? Not so much.

Then again, we have no problems spending billions on helping Afghani and Pakistani economies. Back home? Again, not so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is a despicable weapon that will used to suppress free speech
in this country by independent contractors. The laissez faire attitude regarding these kinds of weapons is one of my pet peeves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Last year, there was at least one Cable TV show that
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 09:35 PM by truedelphi
Featured the glamor and the excitement of these modern types of weaponry.

Just the TV show was enough to make me barf, without the need of newly created weapons systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC