mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:44 AM
Original message |
The indignation expressed by Moaning Joe this morning regarding Sheryl Sherrod is nauseating. nt |
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. so what reaction would be appropriate . . . . |
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I am watching CNBC right now and would you believe |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 05:55 AM by doc03
Rethug Joe Kernan is defending Sharrod. He said this is a case of political correctness gone wild.
|
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. sounds like he might be right |
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day. n/t |
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Ahh, he got The New Script. The Bushigandists don't waste much time, do they? |
|
Yep. Bushiganda jujitsu.
Not about Breitbart or serial propaganda and criminal fraud.
It's about POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
These Bushies and RW Authoritarians have no shame. Unfortunately, their multiple frauds, crimes, propagandas, disinformations, and misinformations have been extraordinarily successful.
And Breitbart will go on and on and on. Make book on it. (not that I am happy about it)
|
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. because people listen to him and give him credibility . . . just like faux |
|
and that includes the D's
|
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Sad, isn't it? Reminds me of the Stockholm Syndrome of the 1933 German Social Democrats |
|
No matter how many times the RW Authoritarian Propaganda Apparatus is debunked, it keeps on going undaunted, given credibility, even by it's victims.
I am amazed at how little history changes. Oh sure, it occasionally dresses up in a new snake-skin, but the stuff that is going down in this nation is nothing more than a "kinder and gentler" (at least for now) variant of what is apparently the oldest story in human history, which is authoritarians taking over and everyone else being completely befuddled and bullied into long-term compliance
I guess we should thank the Founding Fathers for their imperfect, yet amazing system of checks and balances (as well as all their "commie lib'rul" writings). I believe that it's the only reason the Bushies are shoving "liberal Vermin" into Relocation Camps as we speak.
|
Dorian Gray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
with that sentiment.
The story is bothersome on so many levels.
The wife of the farmer that she was reported to have told the story about is defending her. It's an interesting story, and one that shows how easily our prejudices can be riled up.
|
mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. An admission that they, too, participate in the same kind of behavior. Joe was twisting it to the |
|
fault of the administration in a manner of "let me take advantage of this situation."
|
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. and admission regarding which incident that they participated in? |
mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Morning hate. The list is too long... |
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. ahhhhh . . . I get it . . . . the token "hate joe" post |
JamesA1102
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. Joe is scum so is Barnicle |
|
who had the nerve to call out the "culture of demonization" when that's all he did when Clinton was President.
|
deminks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:04 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Horsepuckey. They knew where the story came from. |
|
That's why their producer called the Ag agency. They went with it like everyone else. He blew off Breitbart saying everyone knows there are political hacks out there "on both sides." Well, Morning Jerk knows that too. So, the question comes back to you Jerk, why did you cover the story, knowing full well who the source was??? Hmmmmm???
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:45 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Only because they failed to publicly state that ACORN |
|
was railroaded by the same bunch and Joe Scum and Mika Mouse expressed their righteous indignation against ACORN at that time.
On the other hand they did not join FOX with the character assassination yesterday.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Their assumptions about the WH are even worse than |
|
the so called WHs response to Sherrod
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message |
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
18. The last thing I want to do first thing in the morning |
|
Is watch some ass spout off and ruin my whole day.
|
Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message |
19. And yet sooooo predictable. |
reformist2
(998 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message |
20. It's a hugely embarrassing mistake by the Obama Administration. |
|
Setting aside the libelous nature of the story for a minute, the bottom line is that the White House shouldn't have acted so hastily, especially considering the source. They need to get out in front of this story and issue a huge apology to Ms. Sherrod. They can go after Fox News later.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |