Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Death of the liberal media myth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:54 PM
Original message
Death of the liberal media myth?
IF I could choose one good outcome from this whole Sherrod debacle, it would be that it finally puts to rest the idea that there is an all powerful liberal media in this country. Here's a good HuffPo editorial about it:






Fooled Again by Breitbart and the Wingnut Right


There's nothing shocking or surprising about the latest Andrew Breitbart scam in which he released selectively-edited video of an African American USDA worker, Shirley Sherrod, and accused her of racism against a white farmer couple, the Spooners. That's not to suggest we shouldn't be vigorously talking about it. We absolutely should be. But the most outrageous aspects of the story are fairly typical of everyone involved: Breitbart, the so-called "liberal" news media, Democrats, Fox News Channel and all points in between.

For background purposes, it's important to note that Andrew Breitbart is an attention-whore who is desperate to emulate his mentor, Matt Drudge, and this isn't the first time he's released misleading videotape "evidence" of African Americans behaving badly (or so he claims) in order to drive traffic to his various websites while augmenting his status as a player in the modern conservative movement. He previously engaged in the same chicanery when he released heavily edited and ultimately phony Jackass-style videos in which, he alleges, ACORN workers had given inappropriate advice to a (fake) pimp and a (fake) prostitute who were, among other things, seeking to engage in human trafficking. The videos turned out to be misleading at best, and the fake pimp character went on to plead guilty to charges of entering federal property under false pretense.
.....


Yesterday, on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Margaret Carlson, who is normally one of the more measured and smart analysts on MSNBC, was aghast at the edited video of Sherrod's speech. Carlson compared Sherrod to disgraced tea party leader Mark Williams and exclaimed, "It's every bit as hateful . Look at that woman! I mean, aren't you ashamed?"

It's possible, however unlikely, that the Morning Joe crew and Carlson were unaware of who released the tape. But at some point, journalistic instincts and restraint ought to kick in when it comes to a random videotape excerpt from a previously unknown speaker. Instead, the panel, like the White House and the NAACP, were outraged by Sherrod's out of context remarks without bothering to investigate the source of the video and whether that source was credible. Today, on Morning Joe, Mark Whitaker and Mark Halperin were quick to indict the president while ignoring the initial media hysteria around the video. Halperin went so far as to warn the Democrats of repercussions in the midterms. Repercussions from whom? African Americans? It comes as no surprise that Halperin didn't warn of repercussions against either Breitbart or his co-conspirator Fox News Channel.

And this will all happen again. Why? Because the traditional news media and, to a certain extent, the Democrats including the president, are too easily cowed by right-wing freakouts.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/fooled-again-by-breitbart_b_654594.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bwahahahaha! Yeah, right
Sorry, the "liberal" media story is just too good to let go, even with all this evidence that it's a not true. There might be about six nanoseconds of soul-searching by the popular media folks, followed by complete self-conferred absolution, and by Monday we'll be back to business as usual.

Sorry about laughing in the subject line, because it's not funny at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Well, a girl can dream, right? If they had one scintilla of
conscience they would take a good look at themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. "One scintilla of conscience"
Is strangely lacking these days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think a lot of talking heads (and politicians) assume that once a video clip
or quote makes the news, it's been vetted for at least SOME credibility. I don't think they realized that Fox is like a RW You-Tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Their job is not to assume.....
just like the WH made a mistake here,
the media made the bigger one,
and the difference is that the media
will never admit it.
They'll just move on to the next gotcha story,
and hope this time it sticks.

That should make us scared and angry,
but not necessarily at the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think Fox damaged whatever shred of credibility it may have had left--
I'm hoping that's the upshot of all this, anyway. I think other outlets might look at the context before just running a clip that someone with a known agenda sends in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "I don't think they realized that Fox is like a RW You-Tube."
Then they must live in a cave and have some sort of brain damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. There you have it!
It's all there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wish
This should be proof there is no liberal media conspiracy but I don't think its going to change anything considering there was no evidence in the first place of any kind of left-wing media bias. Meaning you cannot disprove something which was never proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. It won't end, though - the right NEEDS the myths in order to more readily lie
to their audience.
They thrive on -The "Liberal Media", the "Activist Judges", the "Gay Agenda", the "Birth Certificate", the "Obama is a socialist", the "TAX AND SPEND Liberals" and all the rest...

The right has absolutely nothing to offer the American working people, so they use these lies and buzz words to confuse and twist reality to make their rich and corporate masters look good.

They lie, they lie, they lie...


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. those were more or less my EXACT words back in 1994 over the media treatment of Bill Clinton
And Bill Clinton was not even a liberal - he was though in comparison to the right-wing media that spent eight years pulling every single dirty trick in the book to bring him down - no matter what the cost.

Still I remember myself back in 94 personally crowing that at least we will NEVER AGAIN HEAR ANY NONSENSE ABOUT THE LIBERAL MEDIA.

Face it, those people are just plane nuts - relentless - some of them are just being cynical and disingenuous - But I suspect that most of them are so extreme in their assumptions about the world - that short of every major newspaper and every major T.V. news network - sounding like a right-wing Republican version of the Spartacist League - the media will continue to genuinely sound liberal to them in their confused and reactionary minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm afraid that is true. The right wing still laughs at Hillary's
mention of a "vast right wing conspiracy". Relentless is a good word for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. For me, that myth went tits-up decades ago ...
When not a single mainstream media outlet pointed out that Reagan was dangerously out of touch with reality; or that both Reagan and Poppy should have gone to jail over Iran-Contra; or that by any definition Cheney and the Chimp were guilty of war crimes.
Liberal media my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. The 'liberal media' myth will never die. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. What Traditional News Media??
We lost that years ago, too

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC