SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:08 PM
Original message |
Damn..Google went & ruined "image search" |
|
I read about it but just now checked it out...S U C K S !!
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What part of it sucks? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 06:17 PM by tridim
I just looked and it just looks reformatted a bit.
On Edit: I don't like the "load only when scrolled to" part, it's slow enough to be annoying.
|
lazarus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I thought I would like it |
|
but the "infinite scroll" is too slow and jerky.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't like it either. |
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It puts more images on the page. You get the same info as before by |
|
holding your cursor over the image. It worked fine for me. Is it a problem with your computer?
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. I liked SEEING the source from the git-go. You could see at a glance how many were from the same |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It's formatted differently, which I don't mind, |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. They made it like Bing, which was much better imo. Google is becoming Microsoft. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 06:19 PM by onehandle
Copying everyone, buying better technology because their's sucks.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Wow, somebody copied a page in my site |
|
And didn't even have the decency to link to it! Gaaaa, google really doesn't like that so I will have to get on that.
So thanks for making me look! lol.
I don't notice much of a difference.
|
MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I like it. It's faster to display the underlying page, and I don't have |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 07:14 PM by MineralMan
to click and wait for a larger image. All the info's still there. I can't see anything about it I don't like.
Google Bass Fishing Santa, and you'll see my photo of my front yard from two Christmases ago as the number one photo. I'm so proud.
Or Google little aluminum boat, and my boat is number 2 in the results. I couldn't be happier.
:rofl:
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
Edweird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I think it's fantastic |
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-22-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
13. OK, now I've had a few days to use it. You're right, it's AWFUL. |
|
The old functionality is gone, clicks are up, there are more ads, less relevant results, etc. etc.
It's disgusting.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |