Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carl Levin: DADT Vote in September - Troops Have No Veto Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 06:56 AM
Original message
Carl Levin: DADT Vote in September - Troops Have No Veto Power
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 07:04 AM by USArmyParatrooper
http://lezgetreal.com/2010/07/full-congress-likely-to-take-up-dadt-repeal-in-september/comment-page-1/

Full Congress Likely To Take Up DADT Repeal In September



Advocates for the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell are expecting a vote on the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill to occur sometimes in September after the August recess. The language that would repeal DADT is embedded in the Defense budget, and voting against the bill has always been seen as politically difficult no matter what the reasons. The bill funds the troops no matter what their sexual orientation is. Currently, the timetable for the bill being brought to the floor of the Senate is being negotiated between the Senate majority and minority leadership.

According to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, “What we’re hoping to do before August is to have an agreement which will pave the way for it being brought up right after the recess.” The next time that negotiations regarding what is in the bill can come up will be during reconciliation, and that will happen when the two chambers negotiate over differences in the bill.

Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, and the SLDN are urging Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to bring the bill to the floor after Congress returns to work after Labor Day. “Yes, it would have been better if we were on the Senate floor this month, but the calendar was just too crowded,” Sarvis is on record as saying.

“This is the bill that provides for the pay and benefits and equipment for all service members, straight and gay. This bill and these core benefits for our should not be caught up in post election games and posturing,” he has also said.

The biggest concern so far has been that those opposed to repealing DADT might try to get the language struck from the bill either through another amendment or by filibustering the Defense bill. Both are problematic. In order to get a new amendment added to the bill on the floor of the Senate, it will take sixty votes to get it put into the bill. As for filibustering the whole bill, that could be even more problematic politically. It is unlikely that the Republicans will want to look like they are willing to vote against the troops in the middle of a war and right before the election. So far, no amendments have been planned to end the DADT repeal, but Levin predicts that there will be.

Sarvis is confident that the repeal will go through. He stated “The Senate votes are likely to be close, but, in the end, I think, repeal proponents will prevail.” The votes on the amendments are likely to be close or not happen at all. The filibuster on this is likely to be the usual kabuki dance of having just the moderate Republicans vote in favor of ending debate and then having most of the Republicans vote for the bill.

The biggest problem is avoiding the lame duck session after the election. Republicans have vowed to grind Congress to a halt during that time.

Edit: MORE



http://lezgetreal.com/2010/07/carl-levin-makes-it-clear-that-the-troops-do-not-have-veto-power-over-dadt-repeal/

Carl Levin Makes It Clear That The Troops Do Not Have Veto Power Over DADT Repeal



Senator Carl Levin, the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has stated that he understands the frustration that many in the LGBT Community feel regarding the slow process of repealing DADT. Senator Levin spoke to reporters at a breakfast held by the Christian Science Monitor. Regarding the phrasing of the survey, that he has not read, he “can understand the resentment in the gay community.” He stated “the military is not a democracy.”

The Michigan Senator predicted that there would not be a filibuster because those who oppose the repeal of DADT are unlikely to oppose funding the troops. According to Levin “It’s a very good idea to get the attitude of the troops on things,” but that the troops needed to understand that this is not about them having the veto power over the repeal of DADT.

“A lot depends about how the survey is worded … make sure they understand military leadership made a decision. asking these questions as a way to help us implement this effectively,” Levin stated. Levin does feel that the Pentagon should have asked whether or not it was alright to discriminate against lesbians and gays.

Levin stated that Congress was not asked about the wording of the survey. In response to a question regarding whether or not the survey results would be released to the public, Levin stated “They will probably leak but they won’t be leaked at my suggestion.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have little hope of it being repealed now.
After the phony survey and all the encouragement to talk about how scary it is to think of gay people being in a shower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't doubt it at all
A similar survey was done prior to desegregating African Americans in the military.

Let's make a friendly bet on it. The loser must donate $20 to the charity of the winner's choosing. Deal? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you have a deadline?
End of October, 2010?

You're ON! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I was thinking by year end, but what the heck
I'll go with the end of October. I'll even throw in a bonus. If DADT isn't repealed by then I'll dress up in drag for Halloween.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I won't hold you to that one.
Let's just see how the October thing pans out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. There was no similar survey before the services were integrated
I am curious to know what your source is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rachel Maddow. Maybe you've heard of her?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38385231/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/

MADDOW: We have a correction of sorts to make tonight. It was believed both by us and by guests who have appeared on this show and, frankly, by lots of other people, that the survey the Pentagon is doing right now to determine how members of the military feel about the repeal of “don‘t ask, don‘t tell” was an unprecedented thing. We and others believed that when the military had gone through other forms of desegregation either by gender or by race, but they didn‘t conduct this kind of a survey, that prior moves to desegregate the military were top-down decisions that were just made without asking the average infantrymen what he thought about the policy change.
It turns out that‘s not true. Earlier this week, a Pentagon spokesperson told “The Advocate” magazine that Defense Department historians have found evidence that the military did, in fact, conduct surveys about racial integration in the military prior to changing the policy in the ‘40s. Armed with that clue, the folks at “Think Progress” deserve props for actually trooping down to the National Archives and digging up some of the surveys that the military conducted around racial integration in the 1940s, ahead of President Truman‘s 1948 order to desegregate.
Remember, the basic history here is that in 1948, after generations of African-Americans had served in separate all-black units in the U.S. military, President Truman, as commander-in-chief, made the decision to end legal racial discrimination in the military.
Now, remember, this was 1948, six years before the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education mandating that schools be integrated, seven years before the Montgomery bus boycott, 15 years before Martin Luther King delivered his famous “I Have A Dream” speech, 16 years before the Civil Rights Act passed.
Interracial marriage was illegal in more than two dozen states in 1948. In other words, ending racial segregation in the military was a very big deal in 1948. But the military did ask the troops what they thought about the issue beforehand. And the results were—I mean, on the one hand, astonishing, and on the other, weirdly, totally what you‘d expect.
Here‘s what I mean: a 1942 -- a November 1942 survey of white enlisted men‘s feelings about African-Americans in the Air Force found that, quote, “An overwhelming majority of the men feel that Negro and white soldiers should be separated both during and after training.”
Check out the bar graph on this one. Eighty-two percent of enlisted thought African-Americans should attend separate training schools. Seventy-six percent of them wanted them in separate combat crews. And 74 percent thought there should be separate all-black ground crews as well.
Here‘s another survey from 1947 cleverly titled, “Attitudes of Officers and Enlisted Men Toward Certain Minority Groups.” And when they say “certain minority groups,” what they mean is Jews. It was a survey of how members of the armed forces felt about serving not just with black men but with Jewish men.
It turns out they were not thrilled about it. When presented with the statement, “There is nothing good about Jews,” 86 percent of the enlisted men surveyed agreed - 86 percent.
Also, who wrote this freaking survey anyway? As for the question of racial integration, quote, “Four out of five white enlisted men are opposed to the idea of having Negro and white soldiers in the same unit even if they do not eat in the same mess or sleep in the same barracks.”
Do you know how many officers and enlisted men thought black and white soldiers should work and train and live together? How many people were actually in favor of integration? A grand total of seven percent. Seven percent of officers and enlisted men thought the military should be integrated.
So given that - given that these were the views of the troops in 1947, what did President Truman do the following year in 1948? He ordered that there be desegregation. He said to the military essentially, “Deal with it,” and they did. And frankly, that‘s the American way.
We‘re not just a democracy. We‘re a constitutional democracy. There are rights guaranteed to us all by the Constitution. Those rights are not up for a vote. And the reason that‘s truly important, the reason it‘s not just a romantic sepia-toned flashback to the founding of this country is because people always want to vote on rights. They always want to vote on minority rights.
And whenever they do, whenever you put the rights of a minority up for a vote, it almost always fails. On gay rights, for example, the issue of gay marriage has been put to a vote in 31 states.
And all 31 of the states have voted it down. But because this is America, rights are not supposed to be put to a vote. That‘s why they‘re called rights. That‘s why we have a Constitution and why we struggle every day to prove that we still honor it.
Opinions, surveys, polling be darned; this is America and the rights of man are inalienable no matter what skeeves you out. And so now, the Pentagon is surveying the troops on what think about serving with openly gay people. The results may very well be as reactionary as what we saw in those surveys from the 1940s.
And if we are still a constitutional republic, if the concept of inalienable - inalienable equal rights - inalienable equal rights still means something, the results of that survey will be interesting. They will also be completely irrelevant to the question of whether or not this policy should and will be changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you for that information nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Anytime nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Vote Olbermann Maddow in 2012
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I fixed your typo for you.
Vote Olbermann Maddow in 2012 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I believe I probably know her better than you, and I'm still right
There wasn't a survey like this done for the racial integration of the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. So Rachel Maddow is wrong and Think Progress is lying?
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 03:08 PM by USArmyParatrooper
"Armed with that clue, the folks at “Think Progress” deserve props for actually trooping down to the National Archives and digging up some of the surveys that the military conducted around racial integration in the 1940s, ahead of President Truman‘s 1948 order to desegregate."

Edit: And you know her better than me? Are you two drinking buddies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. maybe congress will do what Obama is not doing - stop DADT nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. This just in!
Only Congress can repeal DADT. And of course the President has to sign it unless it passes with a 2/3 majority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Msongs is correct -- Obama can stop DADT
Lt. Choi was JUST discharged via DADT this past week. There is no excuse for service members to be discharged for this at this tim. The President can legally declare a moratorium, and should.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No, he cannot
DADT is legislation passed into law by Congress and as such must be repealed by Congress.

If Obama jumps ahead of an actual repeal it would stir up a shit storm and allow to mount an all out assault for the next two months until the bill hits. I also don't think it's a good idea to give gays the green light to come out before the repeal is actually signed into law.

The vote is less than two months away, and then LT Choi can be recommissioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC