Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Canadian oil company wants to turn this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:08 PM
Original message
A Canadian oil company wants to turn this:
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 05:11 PM by Subdivisions


...and this...



...into this...



Any questions?

http://www.peacefuluprising.org/first-us-tar-sands-to-break-ground-in-utah-20100319

In Grand County, Utah, people are thirsty. Utah is a desert state; it’s a thirsty place. What we love about Utah is its unique, gorgeous, otherworldly geography, which keeps us coming back or sticking around. So explain this logic to me: a horrifying and unprecedented project could put Utah’s Canyonlands National Park and Glen Canyon Recreation Area at serious risk, while at the same time thrusting a new source of water-depleting, CO2-billowing, filthy, and geographically destructive (but pseudoprofitable!) business into the equation.

I’m talking about the first ever bona fide tar sands extraction project in the United States of America–right here, in my own backyard!

You might have heard about the tar sands extraction happening in Canada. This nightmarish debacle has transformed countless acres of priceless Canadian biodiversity into a sticky black cesspool, for primarily America consumption. Don’t take my word for it; do a simple Google image search for “Canadian Tar Sands.” After you’ve done that, imagine the effect these proposed tar pits would have on the land immediately adjacent to the sites. Now picture that land as Canyonlands National Park. I’m not making this up.

The citizens of the areas where the proposed pits would be created have had absolutely no say in the permit acquisition and decision-making surrounding this project—and the pits might potentially break ground this year. Did I mention the entire operation would be run by Canada-based Earth Energy Resources? The company made their excited announcement in November of 2009, although Grand County citizens weren’t made aware of the impending project until this month.

...snip...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Top two photos--this is your brain; last photo- this is your brain on corporate-mind-altering,
politician buying, drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell, its what a bunch of multinational corporations did to Alberta
So if we're still slurpin up the good ol black stuff, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, my God! The oil industry is run by orcs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is your main objection that it'll be done in Utah or that it'll be done by a Canadian company?
I didn't think there were any non-multinational oil companies left, anyway? All the big players have fingers in lots of pies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. My objection is to it being done at all, regardless of where or by whom. Jeez! I can't
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 05:55 PM by Subdivisions
fucking believe I had to respond to such a question.



Edited to remove offensive adjective.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, you included it in your headline, so it seemed you thought it important.
Nice attack. Trying to get your post deleted so you can't even reply to your own thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deleted because I said your question was stupid? Would that change
the fact that it was so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And my point was including it in your headline if you thought it unimportant was.
Thus, my question, but I didn't have to resort to insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I just wrote a headline that fit my post. Get over it. If you have
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:01 PM by Subdivisions
anything to say about the content, rather than presuming shit about me (whom you should know by now and know better than to ask such a question), then I would love to hear it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ross K Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think this is what the guy in the other thread was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Do you support this project? Is this a done deal?
Mining for oil and gas is a Peak Oil proposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, it is. But you can't talk about Peak Oil around here. It's taboo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. the "priceless Canadian biodiversity" was a muskeg swamp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Your point being?
I've BEEN to the Athabasca. I've seen the tar sands underfoot. We're talking wilderness areas that most Americans have no clue about what wild life is supposed to look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did you see the documentary "Gasland?"
They are fracking all over the US.
Nothing, nada about the damage being done
has been made public.
"Gasland" is the closest thing I've seen to anything close to
exposing the pillaging.

It's pretty terrifying, what these companies are doing to the planet.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've been to Canyonlands, one of the most beautiful places...
I've ever been to. This will piss me of royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Recommended. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. how in hell are they doing that in a national park?
Is this something Bush sold on his way out the door?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC