Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Science types: What does the Hadron collider mean for us?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 07:49 AM
Original message
Science types: What does the Hadron collider mean for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. an increase in the energy of the collisions between high energy
protons and anti-protons.

What they seek is what some scientists whimsically call the god particle, because it (the higg's boson) would indicate just how particles have mass.
If found, it would ease the way to finding the TOE and might show a way to determine whether string theory is something that can be tested.

They use a linear accelerator to pump up the protons to a certain level of energy, then, they supersize it, THEN they inject the protons into the circular track, which uses superconducting super cooled magnets to speed it up even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The higgs boson - if found - will certainly answer what question?
Q: Why do things fall?
A: because there is gravity
Q: How does gravity work
A: Higg's Boson
Q: What gives a Higg's Boson it's properties?
A: ???

A fantasy particle needed to make a certain idea work. It's mass and energy has to be continually adjusted upwards as it never turns up in any colliders where predicted -The upper bound for the Higgs is about 200GeV. The claim is that if it's not found by the LHC, it doesn't exist. Previous experiments have been "moving the lower bound for it's mass" - currently at about 114GeV.The main conceptual problem of Higgs boson is, it doesn't explain the origin of mass, it just transfers the explanation to the hypothetical Higgs fields concept. The Higgs model of classical physic always requires the presence of inertial Higgs lattice. I am curious how string theory will have predictions verified by finding such a particle.

An undefined mathematical procedure where the integrands don't satisfy the requirements to be directly integrable that require renormalising the results

I'll stick to my actuarial world and let others tell me about the rewind time world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Never before in the history of physics
has the theoretical been so far ahead of the empirical. "A fantasy designed to make a certain idea work" is string theory in a nutshell.

And ideas like "The claim is that if it's not found by the LHC, it doesn't exist" should be a red flag that truth isn't being sought, but funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I agree - more like a 50's meeting of a sci-fi club than science - string theory meets
Edited on Tue May-15-07 08:51 PM by papau
zero point energy(?) and the vacuum expectation value/condensate and Quantum chromodynamics condensates go non-scalar so Lorentz symmetry violation will be observed - and string theory is some how confirmed?

I feel like the shadow of myself, but I'm not because those curled up dimensions don't throw shadows.
Two thousand six hundred years ago the Greeks pondered "what is real - what is reality" - and I am not sure we have progressed much beyond where they were.

I did not understand the math's physical world implications for experiment design 40 years ago - and I do not understand it now - so if a funding request came in and that was my job, my reaction would be - here - take the money. I am so stuck in the 19th century- sigh..... :-(

But it is fun to read about - just like those sci-fi club meetings and books were back in the 50's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I believe that the scene at the end of
Edited on Tue May-15-07 08:36 AM by antifaschits
the movie Men in Black explains our universe perfectly.


that, and the spaghetti monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. So it's how we go from energy to matter?
Hmm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. for that we need jerry falwell. Damn, too late.
oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. It means a mach-15 jet is on the way and the Cardinals should...
be careful! (kidding, of course. referring to 'Angels and Demons')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like a car for California commuters n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I must be getting dyslexic in my old age
I misread the thread title and was scratching my head for a minute :wtf:

I couldn't see where colliding two of those could be a benifit to science :rofl:


sorry, carry on :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. are you asking what a hadron collider is?
Or what it means for you, outcome wise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. When I see a hot lookin' person, my hadron wants to collide!
:spray:

Why isn't this in the Lounge? :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC