Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DHS report: Shirlington Limo should not have gotten contract (remember Hookergate?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:08 AM
Original message
DHS report: Shirlington Limo should not have gotten contract (remember Hookergate?)
Edited on Tue May-15-07 10:09 AM by babylonsister
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/dhs-reportshirlington-limo--should-not-have-gotten-contract-2007-05-14.html

DHS report: Shirlington Limo should not have gotten contract
By Mike Soraghan
May 15, 2007

snip//

Shirlington became the target of congressional probes last spring when press reports linked the company to the scandal surrounding former Rep. Cunningham (R-Calif.). The firm had been awarded a five-year contract to shuttle DHS employees around in vans. The contract was renewable each year under the HUBZone program, which limits competition to low-income areas. In total, the company had contracts with the department worth $25 million over six years.

snip//

The inspector general report, which was requested by House Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), found that DHS officials gave Shirlington an unfair competitive advantage by telling the company about the department’s transportation needs two months before it notified the public and Shirlington’s competitors. The report also said Shirlington didn’t have the right kind of vans until two months after it started work on the contract.

Shirlington is also mentioned in a bribery indictment against Brent R. Wilkes, a California businessman who is charged with paying the firm to ferry Cunningham around Washington as part of more than $700,000 worth of perks. Those favors were intended to get him to steer lucrative federal contracts to companies that Wilkes controlled.

And Mitchell J. Wade, a defense contractor who has admitted bribing the former congressman, told prosecutors that Wilkes had an arrangement with Shirlington Limousine, which in turn had a relationship with at least one escort service, according to the Wall Street Journal.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. People were getting more than car rides.
In total, the company had contracts with the department worth $25 million over six years.

How much went to Hookers & gay prostitutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep, not to mention the close to a no-bid contract. I want to see
someone connect the dots on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Blackmail?????
Take Congresspersons to these "poker parties" and get them drunk
and have sex available to them and then the defense contractor / Karl Rove
has them over a barrel. Want to vote against such and such defense bill?

Think your wife wants to see pictures of you getting busy with a 16 year old
boy?

The level of corruption is massive. 6 years and 25 million for limo rides ....
that is a a lot of rides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just have to kick this... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC