Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dong Feng 21D, Chinese Missile, Could Shift Pacific Power Balance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:50 AM
Original message
Dong Feng 21D, Chinese Missile, Could Shift Pacific Power Balance
Dong Feng 21D, Chinese Missile, Could Shift Pacific Power Balance
ERIC TALMADGE | 08/ 5/10 05:43 PM | AP

ABOARD THE USS GEORGE WASHINGTON — Nothing projects U.S. global air and sea power more vividly than supercarriers. Bristling with fighter jets that can reach deep into even landlocked trouble zones, America's virtually invincible carrier fleet has long enforced its dominance of the high seas.

China may soon put an end to that.

U.S. naval planners are scrambling to deal with what analysts say is a game-changing weapon being developed by China – an unprecedented carrier-killing missile called the Dong Feng 21D that could be launched from land with enough accuracy to penetrate the defenses of even the most advanced moving aircraft carrier at a distance of more than 1,500 kilometers (900 miles).

Analysts say final testing of the missile could come as soon as the end of this year, though questions remain about how fast China will be able to perfect its accuracy to the level needed to threaten a moving carrier at sea.

The weapon, a version of which was displayed last year in a Chinese military parade, could revolutionize China's role in the Pacific balance of power, seriously weakening Washington's ability to intervene in any potential conflict over Taiwan or North Korea. It could also deny U.S. ships safe access to international waters near China's 11,200-mile (18,000-kilometer) -long coastline.



unhappycamper comment: It's amazing to think that a $2 million dollar missile can take out a $40 billion dollar aircraft carrier. You guys better hurry up and finish the USS Gerald R. Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ahhh, the notorious Long Dong
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 07:00 AM by SpiralHawk
This, um, threat will be of special interest to certain, um, Republicon Supreme Court Family Pharisee Values Corporatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now,see, if we hadn't sold the nation to China, we'd hit those factories. Alas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. At the bottom of the article, it says the missile can reach up to 10 times the speed of sound.
The fastest anti-ship missiles currently are Russian ones, and they can move at about twice to three times the speed of sound, such as the Sunburn anti-ship missiles.

What the Chinese are building sounds more like an ICBM with a thousand-mile range with pin-point accuracy instead of just an anti-ship missile. The only difference is it can hit a target accurately rather than simply getting close. With a nuclear warhead on top of a traditional ICBM, you only need to get within a couple of miles of the target to do damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. the problem is getting the missile from point A to point B
has china enveloped the command and control systems to deliver the missile....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Questions...
Who said it can take out aircraft carriers? Who said it was so very accurate? Who said it can travel 10 times the speed of sound?

Who would benefit the most from some big mean weapon?

In the end, what does the navy want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "In the end, what does the navy want?"
lol. There it is. We wouldn't hear about it unless the navy wanted something. A trillion dollars for a long-dong chastity shield system no doubt. The Chinese are Coming!!! *hides under bed*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Soon to be followed by demands for more money for the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC