Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservapedia: E=mc2 Is A Liberal Conspiracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:53 PM
Original message
Conservapedia: E=mc2 Is A Liberal Conspiracy
To many conservatives, almost everything is a secret liberal plot: from fluoride in the water to medicare reimbursements for end-of-life planning with your doctor to efforts to teach evolution in schools. But Conservapedia founder and Eagle Forum University instructor Andy Schlafly -- Phyllis Schlafly's son -- has found one more liberal plot: the theory of relativity.

If you're behind on your physics, the Theory of Relativity was Albert Einstein's formulation in the early 20th century that gave rise to the famous theorum that E=mc2, otherwise stated as energy is equal to mass times the square of the speed of light. Why does Andy Schlafly hate the theory of relativity? We're pretty sure it's because he's decided it doesn't square with the Bible.

In the entry, "Counterexamples to Relativity," the authors (including Schlafly) write:

The theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/conservapedia_founder_takes_on_the_notorious_liber.php?ref=fpa

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Conservapedia has been Poe'd to within an inch of its life.
To everyone's (except the assholes) great amusement. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Is it real, or a parody? Sometimes even the posters themselves don't know for sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now I understand when someone remarks -
"The stupid - It burns!"

:wtf: :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love Conservapedia!
I spend a lot of time on Wikipedia doing casual research, just because I want to know everything.
When I get bored with that, sometimes I'll go over to Conservapedia.
That place is a laugh a minute!
It's particularly entertaining to read the same entry on both sites.
Wikipedia will have pages of info and many sources listed, while Conservapedia will have 3 lines and no sources.

OK... here's a random example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_cross_bun

http://conservapedia.com/Hot_cross_buns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. They're at the forefront of scholarship...
They use such as innovative research methods as taking the King James Bible, interpreting it without using any authoritative sources, and retranslating it to English without consideration for millennia of Bible scholarship or of the original sources on which credible translations of the Bible are based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can prove E=MC2 with one smiley
Edited on Mon Aug-09-10 05:04 PM by tridim
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. So's 2+2=4. What's the big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't you know that mathematical determinism is a liberal secularist plot to rot children's minds?
To the devout Christian Conservative, two plus two can equal WHATEVER GOD WANTS IT TO EQUAL. Or whatever Wall Street wants it to equal.

Any simplistic, liberal assumptions that the integer "2", added by simple mathematical addition to the integer "2," will inevitably produce the same sum (the integer "4") over and over again, ad infinitum, are just SATANIST ATTEMPTS to push a secularist, science-based, mathematically-determinist agenda on our children!

righteously,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not only that....
It's Jewish science too, as some politicians in the '30s liked to point out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PanoramaIsland Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Metro-Goldwin-Mayer! Albert Eintstein! Goldman-Sachs! ELENA KAGAN! EVERYTHING IS RUN BY JEWS!1111
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. And just when I thought Andy Schlafly couldn't possibly be more of a dumbass.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think it's simply the word "relativity" he doesn't like
Conservatives seem to think Einstein's relativity has something to do with moral relativism.

I'll grant they're not 100% wrong -- if you read stories or articles from the 1920's, you can occasionally spot somebody saying something like, "Einstein proved that everything is relative."

But taking that sort of argument seriously -- and thinking it says anything real about the science -- is not only foolishness but 80-years-out-of-date foolishness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not to mention that mathematicians use Arabic numbers, for God's sake!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. !
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well look on the bright side
at least he is not calling it a JEWISH conspiracy...

Yes, they did not go there, but I am sure the thought passed their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Without relativity, the GPS system would be worthless in one day:
http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

Just a random example.

Relativity is real and it is a law of the universe.

Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I seem to remember reading that they'd drift several meters per day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. When I can't believe they could get any dumber, they do it again!
They did it again!


:rofl:


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. No exceptions=relativism? Hokay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Funny. It used to be called a Jewish conspiracy because Einstein was a Jew.
So conservapedia is rebranding age old anti-semitism.

Actually, the nazis called Einstein the "relativity Jew" and such. First they claimed his theory is wrong. Later when that was no longer possible they claimed that Aryan physicists had already known this stuff way earlier and that Einstein stole it.

The nazis actually published a work titled "One hundered physicists against Einstein". When Einstein heard about it he said "Why one hundered? If I was wrong, one would be sufficient".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yeah. "Jew science". Meanwhile, Jews who fled Hitler's hellhole were working in Los Alamos
building the first atomic bombs.

More proof that right-wing anti-intellectualism tends to bite itself on the ass, eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC