(From the PNAC document "Rebuilding America's Defenses":
"In the future, it will be necessary to unite the current SPACECOM vision for control of space to the institutional responsibilities and interests of a separate military service." The commander-in-chief of SPACECOM at the time the document was drafted was Gen. Richard Myers.)
Today, I encountered a few posts in which people referred to GWB as "incompetent". This falsehood MUST be dealt with: GWB (or whoever is in charge)is FAR from incompetent!!! They certainly do not care one iota for the same values that we here at DU hold so dear. But that does not make them incompetent. Crazy? Perhaps. Out of touch? No Question. Drunk with power? Definitely!!!But "incompetent"? Definitely NOT!!!
I have researched these aspects of the PNAC doctrine "Rebuilding America's Defences" just to prove my point!!!
Look at what all this crazy cabal has accomplished!!!
An example, today's headlines:
U.S. will not allow Russia to veto missile shield: RiceReuters
Tuesday, May 15, 2007; 10:05 AM
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The United States will not permit Russia to veto its plans to build a missile defense shield in Europe, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in the Russian capital on Tuesday.
"The United States needs to be able to move forward to use technology to defend itself and we're going to do that," Rice told reporters after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"I don't think that anyone expects the United States to permit somehow a veto on American security interests."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051500653_pf.htmlPNAC Key Positions
Among the key conclusions of PNAC's defense strategy document (Rebuilding America's Defenses) were the following: "
Develop and deploy global missile defenses to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world." --
IN PROGRESS!!! (see article above)
"
Control the new 'international commons' of space and 'cyberspace,' and pave the way for the creation of a new military service--U.S. Space Forces--with the mission of space control." --
CHECK!!! ("Revealed: US plan to 'own' space" http://www.cndyorks.gn.apc.org/yspace/articles/usplantoownspace.htm)
("USAF Sets Up First Cyberspace Command" http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,118354,00.html)
(Space, Missiles, Cyberspace Changing Military Power http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44453)
"
Increase defense spending, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually." --
CHECK!!! AND MUCH MORE EVEN!!! --
("Bush pushes to increase defense spending, Jump of 7% would top rest of world's military budgets" http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2006/060212-defense-spending.htm)
"Exploit the 'revolution in military affairs' (
transformation to high-tech, unmanned weaponry) to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces." --
CHECK!!! --
("Record-Breaking Pentagon Budget Plan Boosts High-Tech Weaponry" http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=1587415&page=1
"Need to
develop a new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements" complaining that the U.S. has "virtually ceased development of safer and more effective nuclear weapons." --
CHECK!!! --
("Bush pushes for next generation of nukes" http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-07-06-nuclear-usat_x.htm)
"Facing up to the realities of multiple constabulary missions that will require a
permanent allocation of U.S. forces." --
CHECK!!! --
(In Iraq: "Iraq's US/UK Permanent Bases : Intentional Obfuscation" http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MEY20060411&articleId=2257;
In Afghanistan: "US Considering Permanent Bases in Afghanistan, General Says" http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005-03/2005-03-16-voa15.cfm?CFID=75630107&CFTOKEN=36915377)
"America must defend its homeland" by
"reconfiguring its nuclear force" and by missile defense systems that "counteract the effects of the proliferation of ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction."
CHECK" --
("Nuclear Posture Review" http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-posture-review.html)
"Need for a larger U.S. security perimeter" and the U.S. "should seek to establish a network of 'deployment bases' or 'forward operating bases' to increase the reach of current and future forces," citing the need to move beyond Western Europe and Northeast Asia to
increased permanent military presence in Southeast Asia and "other regions of East Asia." Necessary "to cope with the rise of China to great-power status." --
CHECK!!! ("U.S. Wants More Use of South Asian Bases" - http://www.iht.com/articles/2002/02/08/bases_ed3_.php)
Redirecting the U.S. Air Force to move
"toward a global first-strike force." --
CHECK!!! ("Colorado FIRST STRIKE Project" http://www.geocities.com/alphacentauri774/home.html)
End the Clinton administration's "devotion" to the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty. --
CHECK!!!("U.S. quits ABM treaty" -- http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/rec.bush.abm/)
"
North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or similar states (should not be allowed) to undermine American leadership, intimidate American allies, or threaten the American homeland itself." --
IN PROGRESS!!!"Main military missions" necessary to "preserve Pax Americana" and a "unipolar 21st century" are the following: "secure and expand zones of democratic peace, deter rise of new great-power competitor, defend key regions (Europe, East Asia, Middle East), and
exploit transformation of war."
IN PROGRESS!!!According to the PNAC report, "The American peace has proven itself peaceful, stable, and durable. Yet no moment in international politics can be frozen in time: even a global Pax Americana will not preserve itself." To preserve this "American peace" through the 21st century, the PNAC report concludes that the global order "must have a secure foundation on unquestioned U.S. military preeminence." The report struck a prescient note when it observed that
"the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor." -
CHECK!!! --
(9-11!!!!!)(PNAC Quotes taken from:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century)
WE MUST DISPEL THIS RUMOR THAT THEY ARE IMCOMPETENT!!!!