Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why wasn't a guest worker visa program part of NAFTA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:09 PM
Original message
Why wasn't a guest worker visa program part of NAFTA?
I was thinking about this pursuant to another thread where a DUer was talking about the EU and the relatively open situation between borders where employment and goods are concerned. With NAFTA, we have a flow of goods, and of U.S. manufacturing jobs going to Mexico. There's even an agreement between the nations to allow visas for highly skilled professionals. But no program for the free flow of low skilled workers between N.A. countries. I mean, seriously, why can't Mexican workers come here to work easily and why can't I just bop on up to Canada to get a job?

I mean, the business community is forever squawking about how they want "immigration reform" and a guest worker program. Seems to me a free trade deal among North American nations would have been a perfect opportunity to facilitate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't be so impatient! It's just not sensible
We'll be getting to those side agreements on labor rules and environmental regulations in NAFTA just any time now. It's only been 15 years. What's your hurry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oh I know.
I'm just wondering if the big industries - agriculture, meatpacking, construction, etc. - that a large number of undocumented workers kinda like the fact that they're not here legally. You know, in the sense that it's a feature, and not a bug, of the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. When does the business community ever sincerely want "immigration reform"?
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 09:19 PM by LostInAnomie
They enjoy the essentially free flow of cheap labor from Mexico.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. If you allow low skilled workers legal access to the US then it
becomes much harder to employ them at rates far below minimum wage.

They wanted cheap labor and goods, not a program that would actually be right for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Exactly right. As well, it means that those who won't cross illegally are stuck as virtual slaves
south of the border.

Win/win for big ag, big corporate interests, governments etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yup. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because they wanted the slave labor to stay south of the border
Where they couldn't escape north to enjoy the riches of the oligarchs who are exploiting them.

Farmworkers especially. I mean, come on, if Monsanto wants to create monstrous farms out of thousands of niche family farms on ancestral lands, or take over government lands to create their big ag farms and drive all other small farmers out of existence, it's America's prerogative.

USA! USA!

(sarcasm off).

I've said this for a long time. NAFTA should have included immigration reform as well as an economic free trade zone. It's the same way with Central America where our foreign policy has basically deformed the indigenous populations' ability to survive on the land. But we won't allow them to escape the destruction the US has wrought in their home countries. It's shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think the plan was to send the jobs to the unskilled labor
Not let the unskilled labor come to the jobs.

Borders are just lines on a big Monopoly gameboard for the Ruling Class.

Rich folks, maybe with the exception of Roman Polanski, come and go where and when they please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Reagan proposed that,
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 10:27 PM by Sen. Walter Sobchak
As Reagan first campaigned on free trade, full labor mobility between the US, Mexico and Canada was part of the proposal. Basically Reagan wanted to emulate the EU in North America. However when it came time to negotiate only the professional status was seriously negotiated. Even among proponents of free trade a North American economic union was not terribly popular.

And if I recall correctly, you are in IT - so yes, you probably could work in Canada with little difficulty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. IT workers are covered by the high-skilled NAFTA agreement, as I already said.
But if I were low skilled and wanted to bop on up there to work at McDonalds, I'd be SOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "bop on up" no - but they have brought in bus drivers from the US and UK
so the door to blue collar workers isn't slammed quite as shut up here,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. What's the undocumented worker situation like? Comparable to ours in the U.S.? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I wouldn't think so,
Edited on Mon Aug-16-10 03:34 AM by Sen. Walter Sobchak
Supposedly there is a large number (whatever that means) of illegal immigrants from Mainland China and Vietnam in Vancouver and Toronto - but I would imagine these are people who overstayed tourist visas. It is pretty hard to get on an airplane undocumented.

The immigration issue in Canada is what is perceived to be frivolous refugee claims more than anything else. Another factor is certain parts of Canada have such severe labor shortages that even the authorities probably don't care either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is an excellent post.as a resident of Texas...I've seen the reluctance
they LIKE illegal aliens(as they like to call them).Check out Perry's record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. The point was for the US to dump cheap food on Mexico
And Mexico to dump cheap manufactured goods on the US.

No guest worker program was needed because illegal immigration is part of what keeps industrial agriculture's prices low. So for that matter, a guest worker program would be counterproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC