May 16, 2007, 12:19PM
Marriage fee gets surprise blessing
House OKs cost increase, but some lawmakers say bill slipped past themBy POLLY ROSS HUGHES
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau
AUSTIN — In a switch some blamed on end-of-session blur, the House sent Gov. Rick Perry a bill Tuesday that doubles marriage license fees to $60 unless future brides and grooms take a class on how to be good spouses. Before the Senate approved the bill with the fee hike last week, the House had taken it out, calling it a marriage tax and government meddling in private lives.
Tuesday, the House reversed itself, returning a carrot-and-stick approach to the bill. You take the eight-hour class, your marriage license is free. You don't, you pay double. "It just got past me. It got past us all," said Rep. Robert Talton, R-Pasadena, who said he still opposes the fee hike and would change his vote if he could. "I admit that. We're all busy doing conference committees, doing amendments or whatever the case may be," he said. "I know a lot of people weren't paying attention."
Bill sponsor Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, was not available to comment on passage of this bill because he was tied up as chief budget writer for the House. Perry spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger said the governor "looks forward to reviewing the bill in its entirety" when it hits his desk. "The governor certainly supports the idea behind the bill to strengthen marriages," she added. Republicans were the only House members who switched their vote on the fee hike, offering a mixture of reasons.
Rep. Tony Goolsby, R-Dallas, said he "had a lapse of memory" and, like Talton, mistakenly voted to go along with the Senate's marriage fee hike. "I don't think it's necessary," he said, adding he still believes the fee hike is wrong. "You know how it is in the last days of the session. We go at rapid fire here passing bills. I just didn't catch it." Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, who earlier convinced a majority of the House the fee hike amounts to a "marriage tax," made a belated request that the House reconsider its 84-56 vote approving it. It was not granted. "I was just surprised," she said. "I'm not sure people were aware of what happened."
more.....
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/4807939.html