spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:09 PM
Original message |
one year cost of extending tax cuts for the rich...39 BILLION DOLLARS |
|
and 38 democrats in the house oppose allowing them to expire.
makes me ill.
|
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Of course (according to MSNBC) those 38 are facing a tough reelection. nt |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. i see why, they are not acting like democrats..... |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. It's always the money. Sigh. If we just did a better job of talking over the R's and |
|
explaining that this has no affect on We The People (98% of us, anyway!) -- but they've got the voters convinced THEY'RE the ones whose taxes will be increased.
Actually, it's up to those lilly-livered congresspeople to EDUCATE their constituency.
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Trying to protect the dreams of their lotto buying constituents I am sure |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-17-10 03:17 PM by HereSince1628
I know once I hit it big I don't want that bastard government coming and taking away my hard won earnings!!!!!!!
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
5. That wouldn't pay for MEDICARE FOR ALL by any chance? We also need $3 TRILLION in |
|
infrastructure repairs!!! URGENTLY NEEDED!!
|
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. But that would be spending |
|
and increase the deficit. You gotta learn to think like a Blue Dog. Woof=tax cuts for the rich. I would like to think that the DCCC and the DNC would withhold funds for their campaigns but that would be too much to expect.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. no spending necessary. |
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
7. now for people concerned about the deficit, i don't see how they can justify this. |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Benefit to the lower 99% in the country.... Not a damn bit. nt |
Mnemosyne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
11. KnR for visibility. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message |