OmahaBlueDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 10:54 PM
Original message |
Here's something I thought I'd never say: I enjoyed Limbaugh today |
|
...well, all of the minute and a half I had to endure at the gas station. Rush was actually critical of Lisa Murkowski for violating the "William Buckley Rule" (support the most conservative viable candidate) and....he was critical of Karl Rove. It just doesn't get much better than hearing Rush badmouth KKKarl. :evilgrin:
|
Bigmack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Sham fight.... those fuckers are soooo bent... |
|
that they'll be hugging and kissing and dropping the soap all over the place, with all forgotten and forgiven.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Uh, dude, none of us wanted that image... |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I really wish I could unsee that post. TMI nt |
mindwalker_i
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. You put your Gannon in, you take you Gannon out |
|
You put your Gannon in, and you shake it all about.
|
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-21-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. And if those tow get in a shower the soap will be dropped. |
el_bryanto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-21-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. I do wonder why it is so important to point out that Limbaugh may be gay. |
Swamp Rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
MattBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-21-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Rush doesn't get past "most conservative" |
|
Karl actually reads past to the "viable" part. I hope more republicans choose not to consider the viability of their candidates.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |