elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:13 AM
Original message |
Rachel heading for Delaware!!! |
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's pretty stupid to focus on a race that is a foregone conclusion |
|
Better to put your time in going somewhere where it could make a difference. Nevada, say; or Illinois.
I realize the temptation to make fun of Christine O'Donnell is irresistible, and brings ratings. But we already know she's an idiot. I'm disappointed in Rachel for spending time on this.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I HOPE it's a foregone conclustion. Aparently there are a lot of |
|
very uninformed voters in Del. and if the Dems spend all their time laughing at Christine & don't bother to vote, we really COULD end up with this idiot in the Senate!
|
COLGATE4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Don't believe in any 'foregone conclusions' this election cycle. |
|
We need to take every race as deadly serious. If not, we're going to wake up Nov. 3 in a world of hurt beyond description.
|
Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. She should come to Alaska |
|
The race there could possibly be close and still she should be able to get to make fun of the Tea Bagging Republicans...McAdams needs every bit of support possible..
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. With electronic voting, there are no real conclusions unless you know |
|
exactly who paid off whom to do what to the machines.
|
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. That's the response when you have nothing else. |
|
The conspiracy theory, eh. But even if you're right, then it doesn't matter if Rachel goes there or not. The election will be stolen regardless. Right?
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Read Bradblog.com. He's got documented court cases of election fraud. Fact. nt |
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. it highlights the issues of the wingnuts just fine, im disappointed in your stupid accusation |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 12:15 PM by meow mix
of stupidity
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message |