|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:20 PM Original message |
Bill to make it more difficult to challenge foreclosure reaches Obama's desk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Will he sign it or veto it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txaslftist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. He will sign it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just recognizing another state's notaries is not a big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. The banks can send documents out-of-state to get them notarized without due diligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. "A notary's signature is that of a trusted, impartial third party,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. It's more than just other state's notaries. Read the entire article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. It's blanket computerized authorizations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Jennifer Brunner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Excellent, thanks for the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Start of my email to the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the redcoat (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:49 PM Original message |
Letting it through, they passed it unanimously without a rollcall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Vetoing this in a very public manner would probably play well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Nope, never going to happen. I predict he will hang on to it and use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. With the base, yeah. Who gives a shit about them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. funny how that could Fly right through the senste with no worry of votes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Exactly right. Can't pass middle class tax cuts without letting the rich get richer, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuelahWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-06-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
17. From Senator Brunner's blog: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:08 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Exactly. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
19. If he vetoes this I'll be shocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
20. A veto of this would be very good for the Democrats. I can not see him signing it--- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 08:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. we don't know if it is Veto-proof..because it was all done in a roll call vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
24. Update: a White House official says they have concerns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. Update: Victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC