Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been ANY binary Impeachment Poll done by the MSM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 09:37 AM
Original message
Has there been ANY binary Impeachment Poll done by the MSM?
Has ANY "mainstream" polling outfit done any straight-up, yes/no, binary impeachment polling, with no caveats (e.g. "IF he lied about Iraq.."), on Bush/Cheney/Gonzo/etc?

I ask because all through 1998 the polls were gleefully asking if Clinton should be impeached for lying about a blow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just a few. CNN, MSNBC & CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I've only seen "non-scientific" online polls from them. . .
Do you have refs for others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. No. I think they've ALL been non-scientific.
They're afraid to do it any other way, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Spot on. I posted a couple Newsweek polls below that . . .
Edited on Tue May-22-07 11:48 AM by pat_k
. . .probably scared the pants off the folks on the Hill that have been confronted with the results. (Few appear to be aware that these polls exist.)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=937910&mesg_id=938082
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. Newsweek comes the closest
Edited on Tue May-22-07 10:26 AM by pat_k
October 21, 2006 Newsweek Poll (http://january6th.org/oct2006-newsweek-poll-impeach.html">link}
As I read you some things the Democrats might do over the next two years if they take control of Congress, please tell me if you think each should be one of their TOP priorities, a lower priority, or should not be done at all. . .

Impeaching George W. Bush

51% "a priority (top+lower**)
44% "should not be done"
5% "Don't know"

** When impeachment becomes a reality, the distinction between top and low becomes meaningless. They are all people who support impeachment.
January 27, 2007 Newsweek Poll (http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-27-2007/0004514285&EDATE=">link)
"At this point in time, do you personally wish that George W. Bush's presidency was over, or don't you feel this way?

58% Yes, wish it was over

37% No, do not

5% Don't know/refused
Note: The question, "do you personally want it over" strips out all the impeachophobic rationalizations, and thus captures the actual level of support for impeachment.

The breakdown by Party found that 21% of Republicans, which constitutes 7% of all Americans "wish it was over"

Tragically, 12% of Democrats, which constitutes 4% of all Americans (see chart below) "do not" want it over. I suspect that these are people who would jump on the impeachment bus if the Dems get serious about it. While they would like to see Bush impeached, they buy the mistaken belief that leaving Bush in the WH improves chances of Democratic victory in '08.

In addition to the above, polling contradicts two key excuses for refusing to impeach. Their claims that they were elected "on the issues" and to "get things done" and their claims that the public wants them to engage the corrupt and rejected Republicans in "bipartisan" efforts.

It was disapproval of Bush and the Republicans that drove Democrats to victory. In other
words, they were elected to oppose Bush.

The election was not "all about doing something about Iraq" as the establishment is constantly telling us.

People are angry at Bush about the War -- disapproval of his handling of it was cited as a
major reason for Democratic success by 85%. Far fewer ranked Democratic ideas on Iraq
as a major reason (only 61%). In fact, dissatisfaction Bush (71%), dissatisfaction with
Republican spending (67%), and overall dissatisfaction with the Republican Congress
(63%) ranked higher as major reasons than Democratic ideas on Iraq. (Since there is no
good way out of a quagmire, one would expect many who are angry at Bush's War to be a
somewhat ambivalent about what to do now, so these numbers should not be surprising.)

In comparison, "Pro-Democratic" reasons for the Democrats' success were "major reasons"
for less than 50% (with "better candidates" at 27%, ideas on environment and energy at
35%, ideas on the economy, jobs and healthcare at 47%, and dissatisfaction with
Republican partisanship at 48%).

Discussion of the "Reasons for the Democrats' success" poll http://january6th.org/reason">here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think they should leave his sexual orientation out of it. we know he's binary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC