Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key Tax Breaks at Risk as Panel Looks at Cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:10 PM
Original message
Key Tax Breaks at Risk as Panel Looks at Cuts
Sacrosanct tax breaks, including deductions on mortgage interest, remain on the table just weeks before the deficit commission issues recommendations on policies to pare back with the aim of balancing the budget by 2015.

The tax benefits are hugely popular with the public but they have drawn the panel's focus, in part because the White House has said these and other breaks cost the government about $1 trillion a year.

At stake, in addition to the mortgage-interest deductions, are child tax credits and the ability of employees to pay their portion of their health-insurance tab with pretax dollars. Commission officials are expected to look at preserving these breaks but at a lower level, according to people familiar with the matter.

The officials are also looking at potential cuts to defense spending and a freeze on domestic discretionary spending. It is unclear if the 18-member panel will be able to reach an agreement on any of the items by a Dec. 1 deadline.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304354104575568643889337142.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLTopStories#articleTabs_video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the Wall Street Journal, always looking out for the little guy
How about we eliminated or reduce the mortgage interest deduction on second and third (and subsequent) homes, instead of altogether? Or is that too "class warfare"? Or how about we raise the marginal rates on folks making more than $250,000 a year? Or treat the salaries paid to wheeler-dealers as income rather than as capital gains?

No; far better to run a fear-mongering headline and watch people go ballistic over something that isn't going to happen as long as our society regards home ownership as a net benefit, to be encouraged by giving a tax break for mortgage interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Canada has no mortgage tax deduction.
It is considered one part of the reason we had a real estate bubble and they didn't. Other than fraud of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't agree. The bubble was caused by easy credit. We had the interest deduction
well before there was a bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. remember when all interest paid out (including credit cards) was deductable
oops showing my age
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes I remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. and student loans!
Reagan got rid of that one, and lots of other things that someone starting out in the workforce could use to make their tax burden easier for a little while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here you go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. People can't take out big mortgages unless they can afford the payments.
Edited on Mon Oct-25-10 06:52 PM by county worker
If you remove the interest deduction than there will be less spending since the money has to go to taxes rather than to spending or saving.

It is the only deduction that the middle class has. Basically it will be a tax increase on the middle class.

That is the wrong thing to do.

And it still didn't cause the housing bubble and will not cause another one because loans are hard to get unless you can prove you can pay for them.

What the article suggests is to again push the deficit reduction onto the backs of the middle class and poor.

The idea also is one were we pit each of us against each other for the benefit of the rich. They don't want to raise taxes on the top 1% but it is OK to raise them on the rest of us!

The whole deficit reduction meme is one that hurts people like us. Take away good salaries and pensions, medicare, Medicaid, social security, tax deductions and we work and save nothing yet pay taxes that should be paid by the rich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. take away my mortgage deduction and the bank will own my "underwater" house
Edited on Mon Oct-25-10 06:17 PM by KILL THE WISE ONE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I imagine they may just bring down the maximum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The officials are also looking at potential cuts to defense spending
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Yeah, they are looking at reducing pensions and health benefits and that's all.
Edited on Mon Oct-25-10 06:54 PM by county worker
Maybe eliminating the VA also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Magus Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. But not the Bush tax cuts for billionaires.
Nope, can't touch those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I imagine from their point of view those will be expiring.
Right now it will take a new law to keep any of the Bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC