Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Backdated Griffin's Appointment To Get Around The Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:32 AM
Original message
Gonzales Backdated Griffin's Appointment To Get Around The Senate
Edited on Tue May-22-07 11:41 AM by kpete
Gonzales Backdated Griffin's Appointment to Get around Pryor


by emptywheel
Tue May 22, 2007

Yesterday's document dump includes the Control Sheet for Tim Griffin's appointment. The control sheet makes it very clear: Alberto Gonzales signed the appointment on December 18 ... but it was dated December 15.

...........

So why would Alberto Gonzales backdate the Tim Griffin appointment from a Monday to a Friday?

Because Alberto Gonzales and Senator Pryor had a conversation on December 15 at which Pryor asked for reasons why Cummins was resigning and indicated he did not support Griffin for USA. It appears that, after that conversation, they quickly made Griffin's appointment a done deal, only later submitting the paperwork for it. By backdating the appointment, they got Griffin appointed without making it look like they were using the PATRIOT provision specifically to get around the Senate. Which, of course, they were.

........

At which point, on December 19, Kyle Sampson launches into his "gumming it to death" strategy. Apparently, after having retroactively appointed Griffin so as to pretend it occurred before the Pryor conversation, Goodling, Sampson, and Oprison went into a flurry of activity to try to pull off this retroactive fuck-you to the Senator from Arkansas.

more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/22/111456/606
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fraud, fraud, fraud. It is truly ASTOUNDING this guy hasn't been hauled
out of his office in handcuffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Fraud, collusion, wilful failure to know, breach of fiduciary responsibility.
THIS is why some people advance, while others get held back. You got to be willing to cross the line if you want to get ahead in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Really? That's a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jail time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. The firing of the US Attorneys is a gift that just keeps on giving
It has allowed the unraveling of so much more than what was initially suspected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
(Let's talk about the career of former HCA lobbyist Alice S. Fisher in this corrupt politicized BFEE DoJ too, despite her inexperience she was put in charge of the Abramoff prosecution, she also was co-chair of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force along with her pal Paul McNulty)

Then there's AGAG-he should resign and get indicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like the GOP minions on the Judiciary Cmte. will have to stop saying "there's no evidence."
Although I'm sure after a few sips of Kool-Aid, they'll attempt to justify even this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Speculations are moving to higher orbits. Meanwhile, on Tierra Firme, ? ? ?
Edited on Tue May-22-07 12:06 PM by L. Coyote
questions remain. Is this just a case of paperwork prepared on Friday and crossing the desk on Monday?

If NOT, what evidence supports this allegation, aside from circumstantial inferences?

If SO, how will this new cycle of distraction from real, and really immense, crimes ever be slain.
Is this the new "SMARTech ruse" (which lifted it's ugly head again today on DU, and cleverly so (also using just inference), by averting the outright lies)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. What do you mean, Coyote?
I just got here. Is this post just speculation, or is there some substance? Whassup?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You just summed up my question. I'd like to see the substance before yet
Edited on Tue May-22-07 12:37 PM by L. Coyote
another distraction attains great success.

We not only need a list of the scandals, but the list has to be ordered and prioritized:

Highest crimes with $$BILLIONS$$ bilked
Highest crimes with $$MILLIONS$$ bilked
Higher crimes
High crimes
Impeachable Misdemeanors
Non-Impeachable Misdemeanors
Ethical Breeches by Elected Public Officials
Karl just doing his job.
Dirty Tricks by lower-level right-wingers.
Distractions for Lefties.

At the very least, to maintain some DU credibility, let's call a question a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. But Smirk says Gonzo did nothing wrong! (/sarcasm off)
Here's something he did wrong, Smirk. Time for the frog march.

Get going, Congress. Times a wastin'. Obstruction of Justice. Tampering with evidence. Lying to Congress. What more do you people need? A written invitation? Go get 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Question: Why could it possibly be legal?
from the article:

While it's not clear that this is illegal (unless Gonzales later lied about when he appointed Griffin), there seems to be some shadiness going on they're still trying to hide. Note that, according to the list of documents not turned over, the White House and DOJ had a flurry of conversations:

December 15: Notifying C. Oprison of Cummins resignation announcement (Oprison, Goodling)
December 15: Scheduling call with C. Oprison re: Cummins resignation (Oprison, Goodling, Tracy Washington, B Meadows)
December 15: Discussion of issues relating to Cummins resignation/replacement by Griffin (Goodling)
December 18: Forwarding message to Sen. Pryor staff re: ways a person can become a USA (Oprison, Goodling)
December 18: Discussion with Sen. Pryor staff re: ways a person can become a USA (B Russell)
December 18: Request to send Arkansas press clippings to C. Oprison
December 19: Forwarding DeMillo (AP) story: re: Sen. Lincoln's response to appointment of Griffin (From Goodling, to Sampson and Oprison)
December 19: Discussion re: response to DeMillo (AP) story re: Sen. Lincoln's response to appointment of Griffin (Goodling, Scolinos)
December 19: Fowarding discussion re: response to DeMillo (AP) story re: Sen. Lincoln's response to appointment of Griffin (Oprison)
December 19: Fowarding discussion re: response to DeMillo (AP) story re: Sen. Lincoln's response to appointment of Griffin (Goodling)
December 19: Question re: response to DeMillo (AP) story re: Sen. Lincoln's response to appointment of Griffin (Goodling)

SEEMS TO ME YOU WOULD BE FALSIFYING A LEGAL DOCUMENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. i am so sick of all this
all the time, all the crimes, all the getting away with...sick, sick, sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC