Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: sources say Dems knew two months ago Iraq funding bill would be without time-line

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:41 PM
Original message
CNN: sources say Dems knew two months ago Iraq funding bill would be without time-line
Seems like the MSM has been quoting several anonymous Dem sources lately...


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/22/war.funding/index.html

<snip>

A senior Democratic senator said late last week the last-minute attempts by Democrats to get a withdrawal timeline was "political foreplay."

A Democratic leadership source told CNN some two months ago that Democratic leaders knew they would have to send the president a war funding bill without a timeline, and that would likely mean a bill with significant Democratic defections and GOP support.

The maneuvering over the past several weeks has been a Democratic attempt to show their anti-war base that party leaders were trying until the 11th hour to stand up to the president, the source said.

CNN's Dana Bash, Andrea Koppel and Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.



:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:43 PM
Original message
That's clear. K-Y Jelly was used instead of Preparation H.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, basically they're PLAYING GAMES with us, right?
Oh yeah, no reason to be serious or anything. I keep forgetting that the dead troops are just numbers and the whole war thing is just a comma.

Freaking unbelievable!

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Do you really think that cutting off funding would stop this?
I'm surprised at how much credit people give Bush. He does not give a flying shit about any of the people over there, as soon as the funding was cut, he would stop funding any training, stop giving even basic survival gear and blame the democrats. The media would buy the spin, like they always do, from whatever empty suit happened to be up that day in the briefing room and the headline would read. 100 troops killed today because the "democrat" congress refused to give them the funds.

The only way this is going to end is with a Democrat in the White House. There is no way that I can see that we will be out of Iraq before that happens.

Shrub has infested every area of the Government with his "liberty university" "graduates and they will happily do his bidding until the rapture. We need the White House to start cleaning it up and it's going to take a long long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's pretty much the bottom line.
The Democrats are extremely limited in what they can do re. Iraq with Bush in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. A Dermocrat in The White House Won't Matter
If the Republicans control the Congress!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I don't know
with all the "presidential authority" shrubbie and gonzo have given the office I can only imagine the nightmare Hillary would cause the freepers.

But in reality you are right, we will need to have the all three branches at the end of 2008 to really undo the nightmare we are currently in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Do you always take the word of unnamed sources?
I always make sure the information I read is confirmed before making a firm opinion on anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. You do understand the significance of the question mark, do you not?
I was asking a question and responding to the original post with outrage, so as not to disrupt the flow of the thread. I'm certain the truth will come out at some point, but it certainly is believable given what we've seen today, is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. w/ your permission, I will quote you.
unbelievably unbelievable. If this is true, I have lost all hope for this congress. then again, I always had an itch in the back of my head, warning me about something. Now I see why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'A democratic leadership source'.....Let's name names CNN. I call Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Unfortunately, the facts on the ground don't appear to contradict this, in any way.
I wish it weren't true. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The planted stories sure are coming fast and furious.
This stinks to heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. yep, as you noticed yesterday with NBC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. It's so creepy, isn't it?
Thanks for keeping us current. It helps so much. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. just trying to do my part to get DU the info...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. planted stories..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Thank you, frylock.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Political FOREPLAY?
I guess that's 'cause they were getting ready to fuck us all over.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've thought that all along, and I think it makes them look like fools. It would be better to have
sent Bush what he wanted from the very beginning than to fold looking like a bunch of weaklings. I'm very disgusted with us Democrats right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't consider "sources say" to differ much from "some say".
Edited on Tue May-22-07 03:47 PM by gkhouston
Nor am I finding CNN to be lightyears ahead of Fox in the credibility department.

Or could this "source" be named Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I am sure...
That the Democratic Senator named in the report was, in fact, Lieberman. As for the leadership source, who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. Couldn't have been holy joe
he's an INDEPENDENT.

My bet goes to a DCLer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Sources say"...same thing as "some people say"
Someone high up in CNN wants to spread a little bit of discord among the Democratic ranks, it appears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. The campaign seems to be going into a higher gear.
Joe Kennedy would have taken that as a sign of strength. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. We been snookered again. But Madame Squeaker, he who snookers
last snookers best! Elections are coming. Hopefully, you will be sent to Hollywood or retired to your vineyards. Don't let the door hit you on your way out.

That goes for the rest of Democruts too.

:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. If "sources said" that the moon was made of green cheese, you would automatically believe the story?
Sheesh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. "See! We're sorta, maybe, kinda, later, trust us, working to end the war..if Bush apporoves."
If not...well, they'll try another "compromise".

But, they're "keeping their powder dry" until something important comes along like....campaign contributions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Wall Street. That was what that secret trade agreement was.
"We have something, you have something. Let's do business."

But, isn't that what politicians do? How is that surprising? And am I too cynical to live?

We just have to keep working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Cynicism is a much derided philosophy - that probably influenced Jesus.
3. Cynic Ethics

Foremost for understanding the Cynic conception of ethics is that virtue is a life lived in accord with nature. Nature offers the clearest indication of how to live the good life, which is characterized by reason, self-sufficiency, and freedom. Social conventions, however, can hinder the good life by compromising freedom and setting up a code of conduct that is opposed to nature and reason. Conventions are not inherently bad; however, for the Cynic, conventions are often absurd and worthy of ridicule. The Cynics deride the attention paid to the Olympics, the “big thieves” who run the temples and are seen carrying away the “little thieves” who steal from them, politicians as well as the philosophers who attend their courts, fashion, and prayers for such things as fame and fortune.

Only once one has freed oneself from the strictures that impede an ethical life can one be said to be truly free. As such, the Cynics advocate askēsis, or practice, over theory as the means to free oneself from convention, promote self-sufficiency, and live in accord with nature. Such askēsis leads the Cynic to live in poverty, embrace hardship and toil, and permits the Cynic to speak freely about the silly, and often vicious, way life is lived by his or her contemporaries. The Cynics consistently undermine the most hallowed principles of Athenian culture, but they do so for the sake of replacing them with those in accord with reason, nature, and virtue.

Early Christianity

There has been some speculation about whether Jesus was heavily influenced by Cynicism. Indeed, there is a fair amount of evidence for this idea. It is generally agreed that the historical Jesus could speak Greek, and knew something about Greek culture, which would allow him easy access to Cynic teachings. The town of Goddarah, around 20 miles away from Nazareth, was a major settlement and probably home to an itinerant Cynic or two. And there is of course the parallel between the ascetic life of the Cynic preacher and the life of Jesus and his disciples, giving up their money and possessions in favour of a life of poverty. There is also the idea of the 'brotherhood of man' which comes through strongly in both. Jesus taught that the whole of humanity was your family, and this is very similar to the Cynic ideas of family. This idea would be quite shocking to a Jewish society because Judaism places very heavy influence on ties of blood. He challenged Judaism's social materialism and concentrated instead on spirituality - you get the picture by now. When you look at it, there are a huge amount of parallels between the teachings of Jesus and the Cynics (though not perhaps the early period's 'tub philosophy').

During the time of Jesus, the Roman Empire was home to a surprisingly large number of travelling Cynic preachers, so that even if there were none resident in the area it is quite probably he had some contact with them. But note the phrase quite probably; there is no actual evidence of an interface between the two at the time of Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. This wasn't foreplay, this was CYA by the Dems
They could stop this goddamn war now by simply burying all of the supplemental war funding bills deep in committee. But noooo, they have to please their corporate masters(funny, the same masters that are behind the 'Pugs) and keep this profit machine, er, war going for their benefit. All that the Dems have done is try to confuse the American people with smoke and mirrors, cover their ass on the abject failure, and then throw up their hands saying that they can't do a damn thing.

Bullshit.

Votes are running from the party like water through a sieve right now, and if the Dems don't show some courage, stand up and stop this war, they are going to lose in '08. The anti-war liberals will either flee to the Greens or stay at home, while the moderate 'Pugs who want the war to end will go back to voting 'Pug out of disgust. The corporate, DLC wing of the party will thus be unable to muster enough votes to elect anybody to any office, including dogcatcher.

If this war funding does indeed go through, the Dems can kiss it all goodbye. About the only thing that good save them in that scenario would be giving Kucinich, a man whose anti-war creds are beyond questioning, the nomination and hoping he pulls enough of the left back into the fold. Anybody else and they are toast.

Good job there Dems, not only do you consign us to more war, but you are consigning us to more Republican rule:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. You see "no reason" to doubt the word of unnamed sources?
Edited on Tue May-22-07 04:11 PM by brentspeak
While those of us who demand to see actual facts and names are "pollyannas"?

Pravda and FOX News had great success tapping into that kind of uncritical, gullible mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. See this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. uncritical, gullible mentality..
howz that Dem party treating you, brent? Gotta choose your battles, right? Keep that powder dry. Lather, rinse, repeat. See you in Sept when the dems cave again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. They didn't want to spend their summer vacations working on funding bills
you important things need done, visiting their new Dubai vacation homes just given to them for bending over!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'm not a Dem, nor a pollyanna and I don't believe most politicians
do give a damn.

But the manipulation of the media has been stepped up lately. Make of that what you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. "senior Democratic senator" = Lieberman.[nt]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Since when did Karl Rove become a "Democratic Leadership Source"???
(probably rove's words spoonfed to Lieberman)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Since Mitch McConnell became a Democratic aide
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC