|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:23 AM Original message |
"Slut Shaming" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. I agree. It sets a bad a precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think the "missing the waxing trend" comment put this way over the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
34. yup... that part really made my tummy churn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattyGroves (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:53 AM Response to Reply #34 |
74. Actually, the only proof "offered" is the writer's hear-say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
112. There once was a girl named Christine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:22 PM Response to Reply #112 |
118. Are you older than 13? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Remember the attacks on Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:40 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. her cankles.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yup. It was wrong then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
54. I'm sorry. You can't play nice with these people. They'll do or say anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfprtoo (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
128. I agree, and this piece really sums it up for me : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evasporque (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
43. But what about hypocrisy? Didn't O'Donnell diss pre-marital sex? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:10 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. She didn't have sex with this guy, yet she is turned into some slut where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #43 |
95. A lot of people use "hypocrisy" as an excuse to do something they know is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #95 |
139. On the other hand, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. I don't really see it that way. I hold me to my standards, although I don't always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Gawker's Christine O'Donnell tell-all backfires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
4. i agree. you can call her on a lot of things without having to call her a slut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. i felt the same, having to defend palin as she used sexuality for her campaign, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. i remember DUer calling Palin a slut for wearing red shoes, and was like WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good for NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Where does it say this was a Democrat making these remarks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I was referring to the disgusting other thread on this page. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
8. You can't deny that Christine O'Donnell is a hypocrite, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. What did she do? Did she have sex with him, did she masturbate with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. The fact that she would pass judgment on your sexual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. I think the point is that her own behavior doesn't stand up to the judgement she'd pass on you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
132. but it's her "test" that is so fucked up, and you;re pepetuatiing the same awfullness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
101. And when she does that, we criticize her for it. If we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #101 |
122. The difference is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
133. in this case she is being condemned for being a little flirty ! and you're not embarrassed by this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #133 |
142. She is not being condemned at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 03:24 AM Response to Reply #122 |
147. We are accepting the word of an anonymous person about whom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. This Non-Story Got The Coverage It Deserved...None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
13. I agree. Stick with her crazy political positions. There is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
14. I wish NOW would get involved in the trashy Celebriity "Tell Alls" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. There's a lot of work to be done, that's for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. Deleted sub-thread |
pintobean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
20. TSG update |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:14 AM Original message |
Ahhh, so we know "Anonymous"'s name.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
23. Let's see here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:23 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Exposing hypocrisy is one thing, describing her ge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. And we've had similar sorts of tawdry details exposed, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. it's not slut shaming a guy, when he is married, it's not slut shaming when the guy is married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. We're not talking about Hillary here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:06 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Oh yes, we are. that is what the NOW statement is about. All women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:12 AM Response to Reply #42 |
48. You might be, but I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. And you won't discuss Hillarys treatment because it doesn't fit help your argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:24 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Where was the outrage over Diaper Dave? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
135. Well actually, FWIW I expressed that here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 06:14 AM Response to Reply #135 |
148. It's not the sex, it's the hypocrisy of these people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 09:20 PM Response to Reply #148 |
161. If it's really the hypocrisy, then why do people make fun of the sex? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #161 |
163. Because the more uptight the Morality Police are in public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:25 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. If a womans sexual history were treated the same as a man's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Actually, in the case of politicians, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Can you please tell me then what Hillary did that was so hypocritical that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. We're not talking about Hillary here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. read above and use some critical thinking as to why Hillary's treatment is in many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:14 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Again, we are not discussing Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:18 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. I have discussed both with you. Don't make allegations that are untrue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
44. Patronizing a prostitute is a crime. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Having an affair isn't n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Agreed, which is why the Clenis story was overblown IMHO and the Starr report porn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #50 |
92. No, but undisclosed situations of that sort can expose a politician to influence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Volaris (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 03:16 AM Response to Reply #30 |
146. Is there something to be said for the fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
107. Agree 100%. I'm not judging her for going home with the guy. What I am judging her for is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
24. There is nothing sexist or misogynistic about the story it is what it is .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Until the 25 year old Philadelphian comes forward with his name.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #40 |
56. point taken .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:38 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. My grandma didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. My grandma didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:52 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Not at 42... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
31. Women can't have it both ways.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:55 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I certainly don't agree with the man up and cajones references. they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #31 |
66. And you don't see how that in itself is the same kind of sexism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #66 |
154. Agreed, and refusing to stoop to their level isn't letting them "have it both ways" like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
155. Ack - dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
36. The "Gawker" story reeks of being completely untrue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KossackRealityCheck (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #36 |
60. Anonymous but checkable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:58 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. All that can be proven is she went to a party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KossackRealityCheck (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #62 |
86. Not by journalistic standards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #86 |
94. I would assume referring to "journalistic standards" and Gawker in the same sentence.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammytko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
70. she participated in drinking and driving n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
38. gawker? seriously?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
41. I stand by my label of her and don't think it is at all sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #41 |
63. +1, says this woman. It's the JUDGMENTAL hypocrisy of the Magic Christian that riles me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
52. Agree - Out Of Bounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
57. Can't say i agree...anything that highlights the hypocrisy of any politician's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:30 AM Response to Reply #57 |
64. Agree. Is everyone okay with the notion "Do as I SAY, not as I DO"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #64 |
96. Well, actually.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
65. This is no different than blasting Rush for popping oxy's. Exactly 0% different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. It is different, for many reasons. Chief among them: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #69 |
81. Substitute sex for anything else and that very thin logic falls apart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. You're desperate to ignore the sexism in favor of your "hypocrissy" argument, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #82 |
102. I already addressed that in my prior post, so it wasn't avoided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. 3 things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. No one told you what to believe and I defy you to point to a sexist expectation of Susie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Check your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #109 |
129. Sorry for any mixed signals on my end. The "you" was rhetorical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:14 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. And if questions were all we were dealing with that would be fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #131 |
136. Unseemly and underhanded are not the same as sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. You consider that piece crucial because it is the only leg holding up your "non-sexist" case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #137 |
149. How is the piece not relevant? You have to throw it out to present an affirmative case of sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:02 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. Your nearly unreadable rant fails to answer any points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #150 |
156. Ok, sure. I gave every effort to address your points and it was pooh poohed to preserve protect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #156 |
159. If that was your best effort, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 05:20 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. Maybe reading comprehension on your end would be more beneficial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
67. Thank you, and NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
68. Sluts rule. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. You can't! If you like them, you're OBJECTIFYING them!!!!111cos(0)1!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Maybe, but the only thing you'll ever get called for being a slutty man is a man-whore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
73. Bullshit. Men get raked over the coals as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #73 |
77. And what happened to them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #77 |
120. Well, let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
75. So exposing O'Donnell as a hypocrite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. It's not exposure. It's gossip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
121. It's exposure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. So hearsay can be used tarnish the credibility of our opponents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:28 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. It's up to the voters.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Oh dear god what about the men?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Well then DU eats up gossip... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Yes it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #130 |
143. Personally, I would hold myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #143 |
145. You're not holding yourself to any standard when you defend others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. This supposed "exposing" doesn't help anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
76. Slut shaming doesn't work anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:08 AM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Would that more people interested in politics thought like you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #76 |
89. Its not _who_ she slept with thats interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #89 |
110. She didn't sleep with him. Did you even read past the headline? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
83. Deleted message |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
84. What's sexist is demanding a zone of protection for women's hypocrisy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Prove the hypocrisy, then we'll talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Your argument is weak. Let O'Donnell sue for defamation is the guy is lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. That's not how argumentation works, that's how you manipulate dupes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I'm not engaging in "argumentation" (sic), based on proving the veracity of the gawker claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Before you use (sic), you should check that it was misspelled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. "sic" doesn't mean something is misspelled, necessarily--it means the phrasing is in the original |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #93 |
99. Oi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:01 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. It means the phrasing appears in the original, full stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. Tiresome should be your nickname. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
97. It's the hypocracy factor. If she weren't parading around as Miss Morality, I'd agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
98. As much as I can't stand her, this is totally uncalled for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #98 |
108. Her "issues" include dictating to others what sex practices are acceptible, and infringing the repro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
105. Pardon me while I pause for a moment of introspection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sally cat (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
111. I'm impressed. I thought slut shaming would break out in this thread to denounce slut shaming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
felix_numinous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
113. Calling out someone for lying or hypocrisy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
114. But she'd do it to someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCheese (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
115. Agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
116. Setting up a double standard here. OK to tell all re: male politicians but not women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:14 PM Response to Reply #116 |
124. Clinton actually HAD sex. Did O'Donnell? No one knows, not from this story. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #124 |
157. Actually, even if you take this story at Anonymous Dude's word, she didn't. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
117. But What If I'm A Shameless Slut ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
119. NOW is being dumb as hell with this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #119 |
134. "NOW should've kept it's mouth shut"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 12:09 AM Response to Reply #134 |
141. Thanks for your concern... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #141 |
151. Thanks for the revelation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greg K (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
138. Wasn't she insinuating her opponent in the primary was gay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnLover (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
144. I'm curious to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #144 |
153. Those people actually had extra marital affairs or hired prostitues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
152. It was not a political ad and claiming it is is a lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Valienteman (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
158. kick and R. Women of all parties deserve respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dash87 (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
162. That article was so trashy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-30-10 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
164. It exposes her for her hypocrisy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC