Xicano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 12:49 AM
Original message |
Christine O'Donnell: Reporters don't know the Constitution. |
bighughdiehl
(284 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Because the Repubs are really in a position to lecture about "the constitution"... maybe my biggest pet peeve with the baggers...big government and trampling on the constitution were just hunky dory when a white repuke did it.
|
pinboy3niner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Obviously, reporters don't have a clue about the First Amendment |
|
Maybe someone should suggest the radical idea that it be taught in our Journalism schools. :sarcasm:
|
prolesunited
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message |
3. And apparently, neither do Constitional scholars |
|
who have been appalled by her comments.
|
dmr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 01:07 AM
Response to Original message |
4. She's good. Good with twisting & spinning of words. But to answer |
|
her question on why the media is covering her. It's not because the election is close, as she explains. It's the entertainment value. Bad entertainment, but still pure entertainment. Nothing more.
She should go into door to door sales.
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 01:20 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I think I've found a new source of green energy |
|
We take Christine O'Donnell, hook her up to a generator, and ask her why she thinks the First Amendment doesn't provide for the separation of church and state.
|
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. The sad thing is that she is so incredibly stupid that you can't prove to her that she's stupid. |
|
Honestly, if you watched that debate is was glaringly obvious that she had no idea whatsoever what is actually contained in the Constitution. One of the audience members asked her just moments before the church and state question about the 14th, 16th, and 17th amendments. She only knew what one of them actually was and couldn't actually give a coherent answer regarding her view on it. For someone that claims to be a Constitutional expert and wants to legislate "according to the Constitution" like she claims, you'd think she would actually glance over it once or twice.
|
AsahinaKimi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
7. The press probably doesn't know about witchcraft either.. |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 01:26 AM by AsahinaKimi
I am sure she could educate them. Oh wait...
|
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Excuse me I don't understand what she means |
|
when she says this race is tight. Coons has 57% of the poll and she has 43%. What does tight mean to her. The same as she is now saying she said "the phrase....(get that) the phrase separation of church and state is in the first amendment. Course she didn't say it that way, guess she forgets that there is a video of the what was said.
And the odds listed are Coons to win 100% and O'Donnell to win 0% ...I guess I am a little slow because of the time of morning but to me when you get 0% of winning I can't see where it is tight. And just listening to her speak I can not believe the republicans and tea bags in Delaware made her the candidate. Glad they did tho.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-10 02:42 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Christine honey, your party wipes its ass with the Constitution |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message |