fascinating little bit from the firedoglake Libby trial coverage:
looked to see if this was a dupe, couldn't find it.
Looking forward to a David Schuster report on this little tidbit (if Fitz ends up getting it introduced) LOL
As you may remember Scooter Libby did call Russert to bitch about Matthews coverage the Niger controversy.
It is during this call Libby claimed to FBI and GJ that he learned of Plame's identity from Russert.
Russert says Plame did not come up and that Scooter is lying
--------------------------------------------
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/libby-live-matt-cooper-one/<snip>
Wells Somewhat easier, more traditional, Govt wants to introduce note that Libby took while conversation with Matalin, who used to be PS at OVP, during the conversation Matalin stated that Wilson's a snake, Mr Libby wrote it down.
Zeidenberg. These are from Libby's notes, dated July 10. He can't be held accountable for what she said. Mr Libby called Matalin for advice. On July 8 he wrote down notes in which Rove said, people are taking Wilson as a credible expert. 2 days go by, he calls Matalin for advice. She tells him, she gives him strategy. We need someone who can sum it up. This is fitting into Democratic story. It has legs. The story's not going away. We need to address Wilson motivation. The President should wave his wand. "Call Tim," Mary Matalin, he hates Chris, he needs to know it all. Underneath, Mr Libby's notes, Wilson's a snake. As a result, he calls Tim Russert. The fact that he would write that down goes to state of mind. Govt was interested in responding on the merits.Walton a statement Matalin made, not Libby That's extremely prejudicial.
That would buy into govt's theory that defendant had motive to harm Wilson, and that one of the things that he could do, It's very prejudicial that someone else's mindset.
Zeidenberg. Libby makes clear that in course of conversation, it is telephone conversation he tells FBI that Matalin has a colorful way of speaking. To the extent that they want to argue that that's what Matalin writes, an ad hominem attack about critic.
<snip>