Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

108 House Democrats Co-Sponsor Gonzales 'No Confidence' Motion - RawStory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:22 AM
Original message
108 House Democrats Co-Sponsor Gonzales 'No Confidence' Motion - RawStory
<snip>

The number of Congress members co-sponsoring a vote of no confidence for the Attorney General mushroomed to 108 within 48 hours of the introduction of the resolution by Reps. Adam Schiff (CA) and Artur Davis (AL) on Monday. Several prominent Democratic leaders are included on the list of Representatives who are seeking the legislative rebuke and subsequent resignation of Alberto Gonzales.

"The extraordinary support for this House resolution so soon after introduction reflects an emerging consensus in Congress and across the country: Mr. Gonzales should step down," said Rep. Schiff in a statement released to RAW STORY. "The Justice Department needs a strong and independent voice, and someone of unimpeachable credibility. We must reluctantly conclude that the current Attorney General does not fit the bill."

And...

...However, no Republican Members of Congress are accounted for within the list of co-sponsors at this time.

<snip>

Link (with List): http://rawstory.com/news/2007/108_House_Democrats_cosponsor_Gonzales_no_0523.html

Normally I'd be thrilled by this. Today, for some reason... not so much.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take what I can get
A thousand small cuts and all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I bet Blue Dogs are not on the list
Hoyer and Rahm are too busy celebrating and raking in the lobbyist dough on the Iraq Carnage Funding Bill to take any time to round up their gang into protecting the Just Us system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Rahm Is On The List, Steny Is Not !!!
Go to the RawStory link to see the flist so far.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mine is on the list..Lois Capps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Mine Too - Doris Matsui
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. we need items like this to help us determine
the "do nothing dems" from the "do something dems". I am tired of supporting the dems that dont support us. This next election I will only work for the dems that fight. A majority is not worth shit if it's a majority of cowards. I cant wait to get campaigning- I've just got to make up my mind on who to support. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. How long before they withdraw it for fear of "appearing unpatriotic"?
Edited on Wed May-23-07 11:37 AM by hatrack
Or for fear of being accursed of "obstructionism"?

Or for fear of accusations of "playing politics"?

Or because they're worried that they'll appear "soft on crime"?

Or because they're afraid of brown recluse spiders, or James Dobson, or perhaps because of previously undetected agorophobia?

I'm sure they'll find SOME reason to back down on this hard-hitting symbolic resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. You forgot "yelled at by the RW pundits" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh, damn, you're right!
Edited on Wed May-23-07 12:02 PM by hatrack
They're particularly afraid of Tucker Carlson's Radioactive Bowtie of Doom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. You're probably not thrilled because it can be laughed off
by those that abuse power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC