Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy: Goodling Testimony "Confirms Our Worst Fears"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:16 PM
Original message
Leahy: Goodling Testimony "Confirms Our Worst Fears"
Senate Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy (D-VT) reacts to Goodling's testimony today:

“It is curious that yet another senior Justice Department official claims to have limited involvement in compiling the list that led to the firings of several well-performing federal prosecutors. What we have heard today seems to reinforce the mounting evidence that the White House was pulling the strings on this project to target certain prosecutors in different parts of the country.
“It is deeply troubling that the crisis of leadership at the Department allowed the White House to wield undue political influence over key law enforcement decisions and policies. It is unacceptable that a senior Justice Department official was allowed to screen career employees for political loyalty, and it confirms our worst fears about the unprecedented and improper reach of politics into the Department’s professional ranks.

“As Congress continues its oversight to pull back the curtain on the politicization of the Justice Department, it is abundantly clear that we must do all we can to get to the truth behind this matter and the role White House played in it.”

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003287.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. They could save themselves a lot of time by serving KKKarl with
a subpoena.

Put that greasy fingered son of a bitch under oath...I'm sure he knows who was behind the firings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish he had said something like:
"Over the next weeks and months, I look forward to sticking my foot up the asses of these lying chumps, so far, I might require amputation".

But the above will do for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Priceless!
:applause: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cool. But what'll he and his colleagues DO about it?
My gripe of course is less with Leahy than with the coleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They will subpoena KKKRove, KKKRove will say,"I'm not testifying", the Dems take it to court
Edited on Wed May-23-07 05:41 PM by in_cog_ni_to
and by the time the case works its way through the court system...the criminals will be vacationing in Paraguay.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If you're expecting the Democrats to take it to court, you're more of an
optimist than I am right now, I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Without the Rule of Law
Democracy does not work.

But They seem to think the Law does not apply to them.

Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainGlutton Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But, what law have they broken?
Drafting the Justice Department into the administration's service for partisan political purposes SHOULD be illegal -- but AFAIK, it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wrong. It is. Hatch Act.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It certainly is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. perjury, obstruction of justice, abuse of power.
Edited on Wed May-23-07 07:22 PM by Bornaginhooligan
And possible any number of civil service laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC