Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Voters Would Rather Tax The Wealthy Than Cut Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:15 PM
Original message
Poll: Voters Would Rather Tax The Wealthy Than Cut Social Security
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/poll-voters-would-rather-tax-the-wealthy-than-cut-social-security.php

Evan McMorris-Santoro | November 10, 2010, 9:51AM

Voters last week sent Washington a strong message about fixing the federal budget, according to exclusive numbers from a new poll obtained by TPM: Raise taxes on the wealthy and cut the military budget before you touch the nation's largest entitlement program, Social Security.

The survey of voters who cast ballots last Tuesday -- conducted by Democratic pollster PPP and commissioned by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee -- found that when respondents were given the choice between cutting the defense budget, raising taxes on the wealthy and cutting Social Security to reduce the deficit, just 12% said they'd like to see the entitlement program cut. Forty-three percent said they'd prefer to see taxes on the wealthy go up, and 22% said cutting the huge defense budget was the best way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. voters polled overwhelmingly for a public option as well
we saw how that ended...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Voters? Are we sure all these folks voted? If they did, they sure screwed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. This means they will do the exact opposite.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares what the voters want? We don't really work "for the people" unless you mean the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The irony is that cutting social security doesn't cut the deficit.
It simply precludes the need for repayment of that "borrowed" money; it frees bankers and the military industrial complex from ever having to repay their debt to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, but it really doesn't matter what we want.
Does it? Take the Public Option for example. Didn't matter there did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh this is wonderful. Thank god for polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R ! Glad to hear it. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. So let me get this straight...
Voters want to raise taxes on the wealthy and cut the military budget rather than Social Security, so they elected the party that insists on keeping tax cuts for the wealthy and wants to raise military spending and eliminate Social Security.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tale the cap off of SS and
that problem will no longer exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh surely not! Who wouldn't be willing to give up retirement so the rich can get richer?
Senior citizens who sit on the street begging for a coin or two will be happy knowing that their retirement money was given to the rich gentleman that passes by without so much as a glance down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. No shit Sherlock.
Sorry, just typed the first thing that came into my head there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC