lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:36 AM
Original message |
"Al Queda will fight us whereever we are." But I thought we were fighting them over there. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I know, right....and fools just lap that shit up |
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Wherever we are, there we go....wait...that's not the way it goes |
|
...wherever they go we follow....that's it!
|
nonoxy9
(154 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
3. But he's Hiding! he he |
|
And it's hard work to "look" for someone who's "hiding" hehe:puke:
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I know right wingers and other freepers are dumb, but even so |
|
I still don't get why they don't see that it is possible for some small number of Al Qaeda operatives to plan terrorist attacks in the U.S. even if we are in Iraq.
Why they think being in Iraq assures that this won't happen astounds me.
It is so obviously untrue. It only takes 10-20 people and they can steer clear of Iraq and plan the attacks.
The relationship between the war in Iraq and preventing terrorist attacks just does not exist, yet every right wing nut seems to be sure that our being in Iraq somehow forces Al Qaeda to go there to fight us. It just doesn't. Even if some or most of them do, a few can stay back somewhere else and plan a big attack.
It just defies even freeper logic.
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. How come freepers don't want to "fight 'em here" ? I mean it would give them |
|
a chance to show what bad asses they are, give them a chance use their bad ass guns for something other than target practice and killing defenseless animals. One would think that they would love to exact some revenge for 9/11 up close and personal? :shrug: Of course if they really wanted to do that and really were brave, they'd have joined up by now so they could "fight 'em over there" . :evilgrin:
|
nonoxy9
(154 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
6. This is such bu**it! Not only does he embarass the dems |
|
But then this asshole goes out and gloats about it 2 days in a row! I don't know how Reed and Pelosi can look in the mirror:wtf:
|
murray hill farm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Clearly stated....from now on....war that never ends.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
9. so, "We" must take over the world- stop |
|
and take his words to the only logical conclusion- 'we' will have dominion over everyone who is "not for us"-
as * says: "you're either with us, or with the enemy"- and i'm not 'with us' if he represents what 'us' has become.
He's speaking intentionally i believe- Just as he did after 911 when he said it would be a 'new kind of war' that wouldn't have any forseeable ending....
i gotta stop paying attention to the news- It's going to take me down for good. :nuke:
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Howard Dean Redux: And on to Iran! And Syria! And Somalia! And Malaysia! |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Well if news is all that has to take you down, then you better get rid |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message |