LiberalArkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 06:33 PM
Original message |
How about for real life savings, the TSA requires a breath test at every hwy on-ramp? |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm sure if that were technologically possible |
|
They'd do it. Isn't there already an ignition technology where it won't start if you breathe into it an alcohol level?
This kills many more people than airline terrorism disasters. Already everything is done that can be.
Then there is child protective services, which interferes in family life if there is the slightest suggestion of danger.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Or just ban McDonald's. |
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. At least that policy would actually make us safer. n/t |
taterguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Oh great, leave all the drunks on secondary roads |
|
At least on Interstates all they have to do is put cruise control on and not swerve too much.
|
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Secondary roads are much more dangerous on a per mile traveled basis than Interstates..
Perhaps we should have a breath test at every red light instead?
|
taterguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Only if I don't have to stop on a bicycle |
|
I don't have time for that shit
|
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-21-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message |