Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Church of England bishop suspended over royal wedding comments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 09:32 AM
Original message
Church of England bishop suspended over royal wedding comments
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/23/bishop-pete-broadbent-suspended-royal-wedding

Church of England bishop suspended over royal wedding comments
Pete Broadbent wrote disparaging posts on Facebook, one of which spoke of the 'nauseating tosh' surrounding the event
Riazat Butt

A Church of England bishop has been suspended indefinitely following his disparaging remarks about the royal wedding.

Pete Broadbent, a suffragan bishop in Willesden, wrote a series of posts on Facebook, where he said the marriage of Kate Middleton and Prince William would last seven years and described the wedding day as being surrounded by "nauseating tosh". "We need a party in Calais for all good republicans who can't stand the nauseating tosh that surrounds this event," he wrote.

His comments incurred the anger of politicians and fellow clergy, with the outcry forcing him to apologise for his language, which he described as "deeply offensive".

But his apology failed to appease his superior, the bishop of London, the Right Rev Richard Chartres, who said he was "appalled" by Broadbent's comments. In a statement today he said: "In common with most of the country I share the joy which the news of the engagement has brought. "I have now had an opportunity to discuss with Bishop Peter how his comments came to be made and I have noted his unreserved apology. Nevertheless, I have asked him to withdraw from public ministry until further notice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1332338/Kate-Middleton-Prince-Williams-marriage-fall-apart-bishop-suspended.html

BISHOP BROADBENT'S FACEBOOK COMMENTS

(a)  I don’t care about the Royals. I’m a republican.
(b)  History: more broken marriages and philanderers among these people than not. Count them up, back through the ages.
(c)  They cost us an arm and a leg.
(d)  Talent isn’t passed on through peoples’ bloodstock. The hereditary principle is ­corrupt and sexist.
(e)  As with most shallow celebrities . . . they will be set up to fail by the gutter press.

In a reference to the 1981 marriage of Prince Charles and Princess Diana, he adds: ‘I managed to avoid the last disaster in slow motion between Big Ears and the Porcelain Doll, and I hope to avoid this one too.’

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Really...
Edited on Tue Nov-23-10 09:41 AM by BolivarianHero
I'm Canadian and pro-Monarchy because our electoral system is so shit that I don't think we'll come up with something better to elect a head of state. I'd rather QE2 than some Tory fuckwit becoming President on vote splitting or whatever garbage system we come up with. We're too stupid to fix our electoral system, so we're too stupid to come up with a good way of electing a head of state. Besides, I like having a head of state with no real power (beyond that which she holds in Lyndon Larouche's mind); it allows us to criticize those who hold power all we want without some national pride gestapo calling us unpatriotic.

That said, I don't have any love for the Royals and I think that as Broadbents go, Peter is as wise as Ed and ought to be lauded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bravo Bishop!
Tell them the truth - :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Will the Bishop have his own show on FOX now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't get confused by his usage of the word 'republican'
Edited on Tue Nov-23-10 10:11 AM by Canuckistanian
It's really just a code word for "anti-monarchist". Even some parts of the left have advocated abolishing the Monarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. True, but the last time England tried that...
...they wound up being governed by Oliver freakin' Cromwell, who was a rather heartless sort. Just ask the Irish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Regardless of the bent of his views, that is surprising language for clergy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't keep it under your miter, Bish!
Tell the TRUTH! It's your job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm amazed at what people post on Facebook
dumb ass

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. I can't really argue with points A through E
He embarrassed himself with the "Big Ears" and "Porcelain Doll" remark, but other than that, his points make for an interesting discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. What does he have against Daniel Tosh?
Edited on Tue Nov-23-10 11:00 AM by Ian David


Or maybe TOSH - The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital
http://intermountainhealthcare.org/hospitals/tosh/Pages/home.aspx


tosh (uncountable)
1. (chiefly British) Silly nonsense; twaddle, balderdash.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tosh

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. LOL...Big Ears and the Porcelain Doll.
Stay down, Bishop!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Classic definition of a gaffe: accidentally telling the truth (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC