Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. strips intelligence analyst of security clearance and job but won't say why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 05:12 AM
Original message
U.S. strips intelligence analyst of security clearance and job but won't say why
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, November 27, 2010; 12:09 AM

Eighteen months ago, John Dullahan was an intelligence analyst with a long and varied career in both the military and the classified world. Today, he is jobless and blacklisted from the federal workforce, his loyalty to the United States, he says, brought into question.

He just isn't sure why.

On St. Patrick's Day 2009, the government stripped the Irish-born Dullahan's security clearance and fired him from his job at the Defense Intelligence Agency in a manner that has no precedent at the Pentagon - invoking a national security clause that states that it would harm the interests of the United States to inform him of the accusations against him.

As a result, Dullahan, a Vietnam veteran who served at military posts around the world and as a U.N. weapons inspector in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, cannot appeal to a board of senior agency officials, as others in his position might. He is, in effect, stranded.

more

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/26/AR2010112605017.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, , ,
"In February 2009, Dullahan was called down to a security office at work and placed on administrative leave. The next month, he said, he was called back in and offered the opportunity to leave quietly with retirement benefits. If he refused and challenged his firing, he said that he was told the alternative was no retirement and termination on national security grounds.

Dullahan said he was told that he had to make a decision before leaving. After consulting with his wife, he refused."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended that people take 3-4 minutes and read the whole piece, very strange.
The whole article is...very interesting. And very weird, IMO. I really don't know what to make of it.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Republican25 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wikileaks
Something to do with Wikileaks? hmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not likely, he failed the polygraph test in 2008
In early 2008, with the permission of Dullahan's DIA superiors, two FBI agents visited him at his office at Bolling Air Force Base in Washington and asked whether he would be willing to participate in a classified, black program.


Probably FBI counterintelligence had found something they didn't like about his record. The "classified, black program" probably did not exist as anything other than an excuse to give him a thorough going over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I had a similar experience with my Polygraph examination
The examiner did the same routine, except the question was: "Have you ever been a member of a terrorist organization?"

My response kept showing deception. I didn't have the heart to tell him that the terrorist organization I worked for was the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bwahahahaha!
Many years ago I declined an internship there due to those very entrapments and concerns. I figured it could easily become a totalitarian Hell with the Reaganites running things into the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC