Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says NO to 3.5% pay raise for troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 03:29 AM
Original message
Bush says NO to 3.5% pay raise for troops
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/25/AR2007052501923.html

On this Memorial Day weekend, when Americans pause to think about their debt to the men and women who fight our wars, a battle of a different kind is going on -- a struggle between the White House and Congress over pay for the armed forces.

The difference seems small. President Bush proposed a 3 percent, across-the-board increase for all ranks. The House has passed a 3.5 percent increase, and the Senate, also under Democratic control, seems inclined to go along with the higher figure. In a May 16 memo outlining a series of objections to the House version of the defense authorization bill, the White House Office of Management and Budget termed the 3.5 percent increase "unnecessary." It said that "when combined with the overall military benefit package, the President's proposal provides a good quality of life for service members and their families."

That came as news to Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, a freshman Democrat from New Hampshire. She told her colleagues in the House that when her husband was an Army officer during the Vietnam War, "I was a military spouse, and I lived on military pay. It is very difficult to do that. But we do that with honor and with gratitude for the chance to serve this country."

But Shea-Porter said she had to wonder at the values of a president who supports billions of dollars in tax cuts but balks at adequately raising the pay of the soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen. "How much does this really mean?" she asked. Not that much for many in the ranks. "For an E-4 it means $200 a year. Two hundred dollars a year!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dear Mr. pResident:
GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!!!

Support the troops, my fucking ass! :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hear! Hear!
WHAT A HYPOCRITE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well Said!
Couldn't have said it any better.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why can't we cut the pay of the President as punishment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Take it from Evil Dick's Halliburton earniings... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Get yer yellow magnetic ribbon here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Did I correctly understand that each member of Blackwater gets $900 per day?
And Blackwater does a lot of the work that otherwise went to the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. * had no problem accepting a 100% pay raise
when he took office -- he gets $400,000 per year whereas Clinton & previous Presidents got only $200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. And someone posted wondering if he thought about or felt remorse for their deaths and injuries.
hmmmmmf. That fucker knows no bounds for intentional infliction of misery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Will this be in the MSM every waking breath? I think not. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. It should be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. "the Presidents proposal provides a good-quality of life"
They never stop lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. As usual Bush find the most outrageous thing to do and then does it
and then smirks.

Puts to mind a picture of a little boy pulling wings off of butterflies or setting a cat's tail on fire. He does it because he can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. he does it because he can, cuz, no one can stop him???
Edited on Mon May-28-07 07:44 AM by alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. Commander AWOL and republicon cronies HATE our troops
Because they are ASHAMED of their own Chickenhawk Crony status.

And well they should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sometimes Talking Points Are A Good Thing
It should be required of every Democrat speaking in a military area or to a predominately military audience to always mention how "Boooshie vetoed your pay raise and benefits". The corporate media have given this asshat and his total disdain for the military...from deserting to shitting on the Iraqi veterans, but that doesn't mean we should. This regime has totally abused the military and it's time to call Repugnicans on their bullshit of "supporting the troops".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. he is nothing but an a$$hole, yea
he really cares about the troops doesn't he??? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bush is a piece of shit traitor. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. Starting pay for our cannon fodder: $1203.90
Granted, these guys get room, board, and better health care than a lot of us civilians get,

but still, $300/wk before taxes is not so hot.

http://www.army.com/money/payrates_enlisted_a07.html


The officers make a lot more, though:

http://www.army.com/money/payrates_officer_a07.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Congresswoman Shea -Porter has a nice comment on it
"That came as news to Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, a freshman Democrat from New Hampshire. She told her colleagues in the House that when her husband was an Army officer during the Vietnam War, "I was a military spouse, and I lived on military pay. It is very difficult to do that. But we do that with honor and with gratitude for the chance to serve this country."

But Shea-Porter said she had to wonder at the values of a president who supports billions of dollars in tax cuts but balks at adequately raising the pay of the soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen. "How much does this really mean?" she asked. Not that much for many in the ranks. "For an E-4 it means $200 a year. Two hundred dollars a year!"

Bush is comparing raises under him - that happened because of 1999 legislation - to increases under Clinton!

"The White House does not see it as Shea-Porter does. A spokesman for the president told me that military pay has increased 28 percent since 2000 -- more than in a comparable period during the Clinton presidency. Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, who is spearheading the fight for the higher figure on his side of the Capitol, pointed out in an interview that in 1999 Congress established the principle that military pay should increase each year by one-half of 1 percent above the Employment Cost Index -- a measure of civilian pay standards. But the administration says that requirement expired two years ago, and since then, Kerry said, that standard has not been met; last year, the raise was only 2.2 percent, the lowest since 1994. The administration says the long-term pay goal has been met; Kerry insists that a catch-up raise is still needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. forgot to mention,
the risk of serving was lower under Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. And the Supreme Court Justasses couldn't make it on...
$180,000.00 a year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. and yet somehow the DEMOCRATS would be made to look like
we don't support the troops.

WTF is wrong with this country? With our leadership?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC