universal free health care, jobs programs, saving our educational system, keeping our libraries open, R & D for innovative products such as 'green' energy, renovating the voting system to remove the 'TRADE SECRET' code machines and restore transparency, and any number of awesomely beneficial programs that we
could be funding and are underfunding or not funding at all?
Here's my post on the La Macarena massacre, just discovered,--what one investigator described as "an infinity of corpses"--in a area of Colombia that has been a special focus of U.S. and Colombian military operations.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7623513The grave markers have dates of 2005-2010 (but no names). Local people say that the bodies are local political activists--union leaders, human rights workers, community organizers--many of whom have disappeared over the last five years. The Colombian government and military have apparently used their $6 BILLION in U.S. funding to 'cleanse' targeted areas of the political opposition. U.S. military involvement in killing civilians has not been established, but the Pentagon/USAID
plan for La Macarena--laid out in a Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report (link at my OP)--points to some level of U.S. complicity in this Vietnam-style "pacification."
President Obama's 2011 budget cuts funding to Colombia by 11% or 20% (I've seen various figures), but it is still about half a billion dollars for the next year alone. Total visible funding for Colombia from the Bushwhacks plus the Obama administration in another ten year commitment to Colombia, will be about $10 billion, but that doesn't count the costs of the new U.S./Colombia military agreement, which involves U.S. military use of at least SEVEN military bases in Colombia, renovation of at least one base, the probable hidden cost of a new eighth base (on the Guarjira peninsula overlooking Venezuela's main oil reserves, facilities and shipping, in the Gulf of Venezuela, only 20 miles from the Venezuelan border), an infusion of U.S. planes and pilots, USN ships, and US high tech surveillance and weaponry into Colombia, doubling of existing forces (about 1,500 U.S. soldiers and U.S. 'contractors,' with escalation clauses), and potential U.S. military use of all civilian infrastructure in Colombia. (And all of this includes total diplomatic immunity for U.S. soldiers and 'contractors.')
Adding in these costs, in the ten year agreement, plus 'black budget' costs for covert ops (hard to estimate but likely significant), costs of the private and public bureaucracies in Washington which design and report on such activities, propaganda/disinformation costs, lobbying, travel, hobnobbing, partying and so forth--and I think a guestimate of $20 billion is not unrealistic (2000 to 2020 AD). And that's if the Pentagon doesn't decide to expand the war in Colombia to its oil rich neighbors, Venezuela and Ecuador. (In that case, all bets are off, as to estimating the potential costs, not just in dollars, but in lives and good will in the hemisphere. We have already lost substantial good will as a consequence of this military agreement with Colombia and the sneaky U.S. support for the rightwing military coup in Honduras.)
So tell me, why are we doing this--and not doing something better with $10 to $20 billion taxpayer dollars? The highly corrupt U.S. 'war on drugs' has failed. The cocaine just keeps on flowing out of Colombia. The FARC guerillas--a domestic insurgency that has been fighting the fascist Colombian government for over 40 years--are not going to go away. They may be driven out of certain areas but, with zero effort by the government to solve endemic poverty, and with continued Colombian military and death squad brutality against civilians, they will come back. The cost of trying to exterminate the FARC guerrillas has been displacement of 3 BILLION peasant farmers (hundreds of thousands of whom have fled into neighboring Venezuela and Ecuador--who care for these refugees--but most of whom have been driven into urban squalor, internally in Colombia), and the murders of tens of thousands of PEACEFUL people who merely want to form a union or who advocate for the poor.
Both the U.S. "war on drugs" and the U.S./Colombian war on the FARC guerrillas and on civilians satisfy Einstein's definition of insanity. "Insanity," he said, "Is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Why is the U.S. in Colombia? Why is their 40+ year civil war any of our business--except to try to be peacemakers? Why have we sided with a government and military who have one of the worst human rights records on earth? Why has everything we have done there resulted in more mayhem? Why don't we stop being insane?
And what the hell are we doing moving the U.S. military onto at least seven Colombian military bases for "full spectrum" military operations in the Southern Hemisphere (as a USAF document has revealed)?
President Obama may have cut a bit into the Colombian war budget, but I expect those cuts to be restored when Jim DeMint (Puke-SC) gets hold of it. He seems to be running U.S. foreign policy in Latin America. But whatever Colombia gets larded with--$500 million? $700 million? One billion?--and whatever the U.S. military in Colombia gets larded with, and whatever all the attendant visible and covert costs may be--it is money grossly ill spent on an insane strategy of "war" as the solution to every problem, and, when that doesn't work..hey, what do we do next? Oh, yeah,
more war.
One more credit to President Obama. The $500 million he has committed to Colombia is half military, half non-military--a better formula than the military-heavy Bushwhack budgets, although I don't know how much of the "non-military" funding will go to agencies like the USAID for war support activities (civilian cosmetics for military operations) and how much will actually do some good as to poverty reduction. Even so, and considering the ten-year U.S. military commitment, the Obama administration is continuing the policy of adopting Colombia's war as our war, and further risking U.S. military involvement in killing Colombians and in atrocities against civilians, with no end in sight of the failed "war on drugs" or the civil war. The Colombian military's atrocious practice of "false positives"--of falsely identifying murdered civilians as FARC guerrillas, and even luring youths with the promise of jobs, murdering them and dressing them up like FARC guerrillas--exposes both the strategic and moral
failure of their "war." How can we continue to support such depravity with any amount of funding?