Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Is The Problem That Obama’s Bad Advisors Are Responsible For?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 07:27 AM
Original message
What Is The Problem That Obama’s Bad Advisors Are Responsible For?
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/02/what-is-the-problem-that-obamas-bad-advisors-are-responsible-for.php

What Is The Problem That Obama’s Bad Advisors Are Responsible For?
Matthew Yglesias


Edward Luce’s FT piece on how Rahm Emannuel and a tight Chicago-based cabal are ruining the Obama administration is the talk of DC. What I remember from when Rahm used to disagree about things with Nancy Pelosi when they were both in the House, Pelosi was always right so it’s fine by me if people criticize him. But what I don’t understand is what the thing is that’s supposed to be the fault of Obama’s political team. I think any serious look at the situation would have to conclude that Obama’s political advisors are doing a great job.

It’s true that David Axelrod hasn’t successfully hypnotized the congressional Republicans and forced them to vote for Obama’s bills. But nobody can do that. What the White House political team can do is try to create a situation in which people think Obama’s ideas are better than the ideas of those who are voting against his ideas. Look at the latest Post poll and you can see that Team Obama is succeeding at this. Look at the latest poll:



Similarly, asked which party they trust, people picked the Democrats over the Republicans 43 to 37. Or to look at it broadly, unemployment is over 10 percent and consistently more people approve of Obama’s job performance than disapprove. Considering the objective situation, other words, Obama’s political position is incredibly strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. so his advisors are nothing more than a PR staff
wonder if that's the way they see themselves. Wonder if that's the way Obama thinks of them.

Seems results ought to be a part of their job description to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with you; also seems we should take into consideration rethug
obstructionism on EVERYTHING, and that's something too many people don't even want to consider when hurling criticisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vegiegals Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, the advisors have convinced people Dems have better ideas-Now for==
some ACTION!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. They're supposed to microwave American's problems...
.... put the problem in a box, push a button or two, walk away and do something for five minutes and then, BAM! all fixed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. "We need sixty seats" or being more inclined toward 'what to say' as opposed to 'what to DO'
PR staff upthread might be accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Depends on what the goals are
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 12:01 PM by Armstead
If the goal is a fairly narrow one of tinkering to fix the worst of the Bush/GOP F-ups, and tread water against the GOP right-wing attacks, then I guess they're maybe doing okay.

But if the goal is to actually roll up the sleeves and lay the groundwork for real reform to make the economy more equitable, to alter healthcare to release the grip that private insurers have, and to actually rein in the grip of Crony Capitalism and Wall St., then they're not really doing much.

We need something more than a return of 90's style Clintonism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. The small %'s Obama wins buy are evidence of their failure
After 8 years of complete failure, the fact that over 40% of the population still trusts republics is an indication of how poorly they are preforming their function.

Needless compromise and endless caving in has watered down to the point of uselessness anything good Obama was trying to do.

Credit card reform turned into a joke.
The Stimulus bill did more for big banks than anyone else.
Do we even want to talk about the Health Insurance Recovery Act of 2010?

The reason 40% of the country still trusts the republicans (up significantly from when Obama took office) is because nothing Obama has done has impacted them in any significant way and unfortunately, won't. Most people don't both the follow the WHY things aren't working.. they don't know that the republicans they trust are the ones fucking it all up.. they just know "Democrats had a super majority and nothing changed for them".

It is a shame poor advisers destroyed the best opportunity we had for change in the last 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC