Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Milbank: Obama should listen to Rahm. Liberals don't know what they're doing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ohiodemocratic Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:06 AM
Original message
Dana Milbank: Obama should listen to Rahm. Liberals don't know what they're doing
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 10:08 AM by ohiodemocratic
Yesterday, the journalist who was stripped of a Washington Post section for calling Hillary Clinton a "bitch," has high praise for Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel:

Milbank (Washington Post) 2-22-2010: "The president would have been better off heeding Emanuel's counsel. For example, Emanuel bitterly opposed former White House counsel Greg Craig's effort to close the Guantanamo Bay prison within a year, arguing that it wasn't politically feasible. Obama overruled Emanuel, the deadline wasn't met, and Republicans pounced on the president and the Democrats for trying to bring terrorists to U.S. prisons. Likewise, Emanuel fought fiercely against Attorney General Eric Holder's plan to send Khalid Sheik Mohammed to New York for a trial. Emanuel lost, and the result was another political fiasco.

Obama's greatest mistake was failing to listen to Emanuel on health care. Early on, Emanuel argued for a smaller bill with popular items, such as expanding health coverage for children and young adults, that could win some Republican support. He opposed the public option as a needless distraction.

The president disregarded that strategy and sided with Capitol Hill liberals who hoped to ram a larger, less popular bill through Congress with Democratic votes only. The result was, as the world now knows, disastrous.

Had it gone Emanuel's way, a politically popular health-care bill would have passed long ago, leaving plenty of time for other attractive priorities, such as efforts to make college more affordable. We would have seen a continuation of the momentum of the first half of 2009, when Obama followed Emanuel's strategy and got 11 substantive bills on his desk before the August recess. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/19/AR2010021904298.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Back handed rebuke of Rahm
This article is kinda funny. It is intended upon being an article supportive of Rahm. But really, in the end it basically says that Rahm can't execute Obama's agenda, and in fact argues against it. Maybe someone needs to point out who got elected. Better yet, maybe someone needs to get out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck Dana Millbank
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Milbank is a smarmy dickhead...It doesn't surprise me that he's rooting for Rahm..another creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Be sure to read Cenk Ughar's take on this as discussed here
yesterday... I don't necessarily agree with him that Rahm is imminently on the way out, but it seems clear that he dictated this to his willing stenographer, Milbank

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7765748
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Milbank is a Yale/Skull and Bones privileged elitist.
And, by the way, calling women 'bitches' is okay with too many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. don't you see that he is sowing seeds of trouble on purpose because he knows
how much controversy, real or imagined, there is about Rahm? Feel free to fall for it, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I always remember when KO banned Milbank from Countdown
KO knew he had become a snake in the grass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC