|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:07 PM Original message |
Krugman: No Exit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. To the spastic unrecc'ing crew: Are you arguing that the Fed should raise rates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They aren't unreccing the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I like the unrec feature and I rec his posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. what the hell is a negative Fed fund rate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Is that where you get back less than what you paid for Treasury notes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. No, it's an estimate of optimal fed policy, not an actual rate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. The Rudebusch version of the Taylor rule is a formula that correlates well with actual Fed policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yep, the "second stimulus" needs to start with not bailing out of the first stimulus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. If this is true, should we be expecting deflation for the next |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Not nominal deflation, but stagnating sub-target inflation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-26-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Inflation below 2%? We've had 10% inflation this month alone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC