Which is your Upmost Priority?

[FrenchieCat]

Fighting against RW propaganda or fighting against the Democratic Party?

Adj. 1. upmost - at or nearest to the top; "the uppermost book in the pile"; "on the topmost step"
topmost, uppermost
top - situated at the top or highest position; "the top shelf"


priority - pri·or·i·ty (pr-ôr-t, -r-)
n. pl. pri·or·i·ties
1. Precedence, especially established by order of importance or urgency.
2.
a. An established right to precedence.
b. An authoritative rating that establishes such precedence.
3. A preceding or coming earlier in time.
4. Something afforded or deserving prior attention.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/priority

[saracat]

1. How about fighting for the "people" and not putting party above people?

I am support those Democrats who support the people.And I will fight against those Democrats and Republicans, and anyonelese who fight to deprive the people of their right to life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

[FrenchieCat]

2. Awe Man! Ignored answered first!

[Robb]

3. It's an interesting question when you ask it this way, actually.

In general, whoever's got the nation's tiller is at greatest danger of steering it into the rocks, so to speak. I suspect a lot of DUers that spend a lot of time "attacking" Dems feel that way.

Myself, I'm a shameless partisan, but really only because the GOP hasn't had a good idea in a generation.

[Prism]

4. It seems like it's against the Democratic Party, at the moment

Oh, I know you're using a silly dichotomy here, but I'll play the propaganda game.

At this point in time, the Democrats have all the power. Solid majorities, the presidency, and after the 2008 election, all the momentum.

It is our party that brings legislation forward, it is our party that passes it, it is our President who is supposed to be leading the charge for reform.

Republicans may bitch and moan and obstruct - it's why I don't vote for them - but the Democratic Party is now the one holding all the legislative and executive cards. They're the ones folding, folding, folding. They're the ones trying to bind American health care to private, for-profit corporations for a generation.

I stand with Candidate Obama against mandates and for a strong public option. I guess Candidate Obama was also fighting against the Democratic party during his campaign. It happens. I feel like I'm in good company in supporting Candidate Obama's policies.

That American health-care must be forever bound to for-profit vehicles is the ultimate Right-Wing Propaganda.

I suppose my question is, why are you such an ardent champion of it? It will be the greatest conservative victory for a generation. They vanquished the idea that this country should join the rest of the western world in making health care a civil right.

Note: The word is "utmost" by the way.

[FrenchieCat]

6. the Democrats have all the power? Solid majorities?

I'll disagree with both of those statements,
which the rest of your justification is based on.

Don't Confuse "Utmost" with "Upmost"
http://grammartips.homestead.com/utmost.html

[Prism]

9. The Democrats don't control Congress and the Presidency?

I'd be interested to know how you're rationalizing away that cold, hard, indisputable fact.

I didn't know that about utmost/upmost. I've never even seen that word before. Spell-check doesn't recognize it. Huh. Learn something new every day.

[FrenchieCat]

10. Dems obviously don't have ALL of the power, which is what you said,

otherwise, there would be no hold up by this senator and that senator as far as Nominations, filubusters, etc.... but you knew that.

As for what is "Solid"......That's up to debate, and based on the definition below,
far as I can see, those I highlighted don't really correspond with what the Dems
have in my humble opinion.

Solid - sol·id   /ˈsɒlɪd/ Show Spelled Show IPA
–adjective

1.having three dimensions (length, breadth, and thickness), as a geometrical body or figure.
2.of or pertaining to bodies or figures of three dimensions.
3.having the interior completely filled up, free from cavities, or not hollow: a solid piece of chocolate.
4.without openings or breaks: a solid wall.
5.firm, hard, or compact in substance: solid ground.
6.having relative firmness, coherence of particles, or persistence of form, as matter that is not liquid or gaseous: solid particles suspended in a liquid.
7.pertaining to such matter: Water in a solid state is ice.
8.dense, thick, or heavy in nature or appearance: solid masses of cloud.
9.not flimsy, slight, or light, as buildings, furniture, fabrics, or food; substantial.
10.of a substantial character; not superficial, trifling, or frivolous: a solid work of scientific scholarship.
11.without separation or division; continuous: a solid row of buildings.
12.whole or entire: one solid hour.
13.forming the whole; consisting entirely of one substance or material: solid gold.
14.uniform in tone or shades, as a color: a solid blue dress.
15.real or genuine: solid comfort.
16.sound or reliable, as reasons or arguments: solid facts.
17.sober-minded; fully reliable or sensible: a solid citizen.
18.financially sound or strong: Our company is solid.
19.cubic: A solid foot contains 1728 solid inches.
20.written without a hyphen, as a compound word.
21.having the lines not separated by leads, or having few open spaces, as type or printing.
22.thorough, vigorous, great, big, etc. (with emphatic force, often after good): a good solid blow.
23.firmly united or consolidated: a solid combination.
24.united or unanimous in opinion, policy, etc.
25.on a friendly, favorable, or advantageous footing (often prec. by in): He was in solid with her parents.
26.Slang. excellent, esp. musically.
–noun
27.a body or object having three dimensions (length, breadth, and thickness).
28.a solid substance or body; a substance exhibiting rigidity.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/solid?jss=1

[Prism]

11. It's not up for debate, actually

60/40 is a solid majority by any standard definition. If you have to use semantics to attempt the argument, you've already lost.

Yes, now it's 59/41, but that is still the best majority enjoyed in forty years. It's strange how, when Brown won, the media was castigated for behaving as if it was catastrophic for the party when in reality we still have this great majority. And yet, now that it's convenient, suddenly the majority is really no big deal. Not as important as you'd think. Certainly not as powerful as advertised.

That's the problem with propaganda. It usually has to shift so often and egregiously that its own internal logic falls apart at the slightest touch.

[FrenchieCat]

17. You're really hilarious!

:rofl:

Like we are blind and cannot see that the Dem majorities aren't solid
in the way that they would need to be to get it all done.

Like we haven't witnessed the lack of solidity in the elected Democrats in congress,
and even here!

Propaganda? Sure, ok......

Logic? not coming from you on this.....not even a bit of common sense.

[IndianaGreen]

5. Blue Dogs and conservaDems are rightwingers

and they are as much a threat to the interests of the working class as the GOP flavour variety.

[FrenchieCat]

7. So in essence your answer is Both? Or do you regard what the Blue Dogs spew

to still be RW propaganda?

[IndianaGreen]

14. Blue Dogs are rightwingers

with a D after their name for a fig leave.

[asdjrocky]

8. The truth. Always.

[bigwillq]

12. Yay, Grammar Class!!

:bounce:

(as bigwillq takes his place in the front of the class, 'Bs' are always in the front!!)

[Ozymanithrax]

13. Enacting the current health care bill is what is uppermost now...

I fight whoever opposes the bill, whether they follow the fantasy idea that it is Socialism, the fantasy idea that it is Corporatism, Kucinichites who believe that nothing is better than something, the selfish who prefer to risk their health at everybody else's expense, or any other justification they have for opposing the most progressive bill since Medicare and Medicaid were enacted.

[Jakes Progress]

15. Of course you stack the vote.

How about fighting for the people - screw whatever letter someone puts by their name. If a Democrat eats children, she should be condemned. If a republican ever voted to go the right thing (could happen even though it hasn't yet) she should be supported.

I support the Democratic principles that I see as historic and progressive. Just because someone comes to the party doesn't mean they didn't crash. I don't support people without principles. Candidates espouse principles and then often back off when elected. Then I quit supporting them.

I know that life would be simpler your way, but it wouldn't be better.

[FrenchieCat]

16. the choices are one, the other, both or none.

If you don't like this poll,
that's ok too! :hi:

[Jakes Progress]

22. Sounds like the standard media constructed poll

So I guess it is okay because I don't like it.

[mkultra]

18. anyone who thinks the dems are as dangerous as the republicans is a fool

sorry about that. I mean, sorry your a fool.

[Sebastian Doyle]

19. Fighting rightwing propaganda always

...including when it comes from "Democrats".

[maxsolomon]

20. since it's definition time:

ut·most < út mst >

adjective

Definition:

1. of greatest degree: of the greatest degree, number, or amount

2. at extremity: at the most distant point or extremity

noun

Definition:

greatest degree or amount: the greatest degree, number, or amount of something, especially the greatest effort that somebody is capable of
I did my utmost to persuade her.

< Old English ūt(e)mest<out + -most>

[Fire1]

23. Yep. This is the one I use. n/t

[bigwillq]

24. Yeah, I believe it's utmost (nt)

[Uncle Joe]

21. Both because they can both be wrong and have been throughout history, depending on the issue.

At one time the Democratic Party supported slavery, at another time it supported Civil Rights.

The problem today is in the blurring of the parties on too many critical issues, so I voted both, although my preference would have been fighting for the general welfare of the nation.

"general" being the whole as opposed to a particular.

"welfare" the state of being or doing well; the condition of health, prosperity and happiness.

From my perspective the current leadership has not been fighting for the whole or health so much as fighting for a particular and private profit for a redundant industry.

Thanks for the thread, FrenchieCat.

[theothersnippywshrub]

25. Limiting and decreasing the political power and influence of the reich wing of the GOP

should be the number one issue of every liberal, especially single issue liberals.

[frylock]

26. neither..

keep fuckin that chicken!