Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the matter with white people?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:38 AM
Original message
What's the matter with white people?
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 02:52 AM by SpartanDem
What's the matter with white people?
Too many believe -- incorrectly -- that healthcare reform helps "other people," not themselves
By Joan Walsh

Frank Rich's column "The Rage Is Not About Health Care" got a lot of attention this weekend. It ran through the examples of Republican overreaction and right-wing rage in response to the passage of healthcare reform – all of it well-covered in Salon -- and concluded the rage mainly stems from the fact that whites are about to become the minority in this country.

Rich isn't wrong (although calling last week's uprising a "small scale mimicry of Kristallnacht" was a little shrill). The "I want my country back!" rhetoric does reflect a mind-set in which one's country has been taken away by ... others. But in thinking about race this weekend, I got more out of a column by Ron Brownstein, which examined poll data showing that white voters -- wrongly -- tend to believe healthcare reform helped "other people," not themselves.

Even though the Obama administration tried to stress the bill's benefits to all families -- insurance for folks with preexisting conditions, restrictions on companies dropping you when you get sick, letting kids stay on parents' policies until they're 26, as well as subsidies that will mainly go to middle- and working-class families (the poor are already covered by Medicaid) -- a Gallup survey found that 57 percent of white respondents said that the bill would help the uninsured, and 52 percent said that it would improve conditions for low-income families. Only a third of whites thought it would benefit the country, and shockingly, only 20 percent thought it would benefit their family. (Nonwhites polled were more likely to say the bill would help their families.)

Those doubts were especially pronounced among white voters with less than a college education, Gallup found -- the group that most resisted candidate Obama in 2008. They're the least likely to say the plan would benefit the country, even though they're more than twice as likely to lack health insurance as college-educated whites. We can shake our heads at their ignorance, perhaps even racism, or we can try to understand the roots of their doubt. Brownstein points to a Stanley Greenberg poll that found these whites are reaching a tipping point that could send them even more enthusiastically toward Republicans this year. He also notes that among the 34 House Democrats who opposed the healthcare reform bill, 28 percent come from districts with a higher than average percentage of non-college educated whites in their districts.


http://www.salon.com/news/healthcare_reform/index.html?story=/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/29/white_voters_and_health_care_reform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know what's up with white people.
I don't get it either. What's up with haters of any persuasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. It's because their was a time in this country when if you were white
It's because their was a time in this country when if you were white, You didn't have to compete with anyone for a job. If a plant had 25 opening and 25 whites and 5 non-whites applied, because of segregation, racism, and gender discrimination the 25 whites guys got the job...regardless if they were qualified, talented, smart enough, or experienced.

Now those same people have to actually compete with everyone: women, minorities, and gays. Now, you actually have to plan for your future, study, gain work experience, train, and compete. They can't handle it. It's ironic that by having the most qualified person gain employment is actually very capitalistic. But their version of capitalism doesn't include them working for it so they get confused.

Despite the fact it's been decades of this change, they've just been taught that Your white & talented (whether or not they really are) but The Government is giving the jobs to Others (but they're really not as talented). Then they go out in the workforce and realize "Shit it's too late, I'm not that smart, I have to work for it, I have to study, etc" and they are angry at themselves and the mythology they were taught.

Denial & anger is easier than accepting that you have to plan for your future or work at it.

Just my opinion from my personal experience where I live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Chris Rock and I agree with you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. +1
White working class people were very progressive and supported numerous government expansion programs esp. during the New Deal. Once the Civil Rights Act passed and benefits from increased social spending had to be shared, working class Whites became conservative, even though they too are suffering the lack of social spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. +100000
That's exactly it. When they say they want 'their country' back it's a country where minorities were discriminated against, and women existed only for men to ogle and fondle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. How much time do you have?
What's the matter with white people? We lack modesty. But recall, not nearly all of us have a problem. More whites voted for Obama than any other ethnic group (although the percentages were considerably lower than African-Americans or Hispanics). I have never been a racist - at least, I don't think I ever was - and have always been white on the outside.

I dunno. People who have never been taken down a peg in their lives generally need to be taken down a peg. What more can one say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Public transit. Public job training. Public food.
An interesting session I saw on CNN pointed out that white folks didn't see themselves as part of the "public", and thus, "public" programs benefited others than themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. In my experience, that only applies to some white folks.
Poorer whites, especially in urban areas, tend not to be racist at all. Segregation breeds racism, and integration very effectively eliminates it. Suburban whites tend to be racist when they grow up in affluent communities, probably because affluent communities are very white. Rural whites tend to be racist, and rural areas are the least integrated in the nation.

Part of the problem is American exceptionalism; Americans are taught to believe their country is exceptional and that they themselves are special because they are Americans. This is a treacherous mindset; the trouble with circular logic is that it's difficult to escape from it. So I can entirely believe there's a subset of white people who think the "public" refers to the great unwashed, and that they themselves are exceptional.

Or perhaps the right has successfully defined "public" as poli-speak for "socialism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Population density, especially in coastal areas and along trade routes, breeds liberalism
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 04:45 PM by PurityOfEssence
A simple look at voting maps bears this out: the denser the population, the bluer it tends to be. Having said that, though, this is a very poisonous thread, and displays plenty of latent racism of its own. Caucasians aren't the only ones filled with self-congratulatory delusions of superiority or a habit of sneering at others; racicm is an equal opportunity affliction.

This is not directed at you, by the way; yours was a post that contributes to the good dialogue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Yes, there seems to be a reluctance among whites to be called "the public"
Especially when we're ALL "the public". The original word "public" originally meant "the people", with no connotations of class, wealth or social standing.

There seems to be a creeping meaning to the word "public" to indicate "lower class" because only "poor people" use "public pools" or "public transportation", when that was not the intention AT ALL in naming common resources "public".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. Is there shame in "government cheese"?
The sad thing, I think, is that Hollywood actors didn't understand the world others lived in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. My husband said....."They'll get what they deserve".....
I think he was pissed....cause he's not usually quite like that,
in terms of clumping White folks together like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Jeez, I hope so. What an awful thing to say. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. In my nastier moments, I feel the same way.
I wish that every teabagger dying for lack of proper health care could be asked before he dies, "How's that white privilege workin' out for ya?" Jesse Jackson, however, showed a more humane and constructive attitude recently when he encountered a group of teabaggers from West Virginia protesting health care reform. He reacted not in anger but in sorrow and empathy, noting that they were none too well-off, themselves, and were fighting against their own better interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. He sounds racist to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I don't consider him to be so.
But he's Black man who was born in a housing project,
and has his own history in what that comment meant to him.
Most Black folks would know exactly what he meant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Racism isn't limited to any one skin color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I think the "They'll get what they deserve" was more talking about
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 07:25 PM by FrenchieCat
Those white folks, not all white folks....
considering that my hubby's MIL is White, his wife is half white,
his SIL is White, and his youngest daughter's boyfriend is white....

but it is interesting how folks are choosing to intepret
what my Black man said, in the very worse of ways.

I find that fascinating...cause usually folks are looking
to make excuses for racism by saying, maybe it wasn't this,
maybe it was really something else...

But lo and behold, in this particular case, folks are literally looking for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Didn't have to look far.
Anyone is capable of acting racist because of anger. It's the human condition. But that doesn't mean people shouldn't be called on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Another sad element of human nature
is that often those who are the most combative and inflammatory are also the ones who expect the most accomodation. Others are simple caricatures deserving of no toleration at all, but they huff and fully expect the benefit of every doubt and the right to rear up with dudgeon when the least bit questioned.

I'm surprised she didn't alert you and campaign to have you drummed out of the communal forum as is her usual tactic, but I forgot about the latent sanctimony and need to vilify those who resist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilyeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. I agree with Joan.
I mentioned this a few weeks ago when there was a debate about whether or not racism was apart of the teabaggers anger. Someone said that there wasn't because if Hillary was President they would still hate it. I agreed that they would still be angry about the bill if Hillary was President. However, that doesn't mean there wouldn't have been some racial undertones. Some of them would also assume that the bill is helping "lazy minorities" and would hurt working class whites. This is the type of crap my teabagger Aunt and her friends say. I wonder if she was polled lol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. There are white progressives and white regressives...
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 06:36 AM by polichick
...the second group is fearful and racist. It's as simple as that.

(And they're not all poor and uneducated - I know some wealthy, highly educated people who believe Faux is news and wouldn't believe a word this black president says.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Stupid doesn't have anything to do with education.
Plenty of highly-educated people are morons, and I've known some VERY intelligent people who never went to college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. True dat - some of the most intelligent and wisest people I've known were mostly self-taught. nt
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 08:16 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. This white person gets it but doesn't understand why the others are being such asses
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Disinformation that is not challenged by the media helps maintain the fear
Fear tactics work in this country so it is always used to influence public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Whats the matter with (Insert favorite racial, religious or any group bigots target)?
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 07:51 AM by stray cat
Bigoted statements are acceptable if it targets someone progressives don't like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. That's the problem with insular politics
You start off with the most negative things you can think of about the other side and it goes downhill from there. Frank Rich is about as thoughtful as the contents of a fresh latrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. I grew up in a very wealthy, almost nearly white town. And I decided when I graduated
high school that I was never going back there. Some white people that grow up like me need to learn to not shelter themselves anymore, find friends of different races, and grow as people. I know I did. My best friend in college was a young black man named Tom. He was an RA in the dorm next to mine. It was the best thing that ever happened to me. Neither of us discriminated against the other. Of course, my parents thought we might date and did not like that at all. This was in 1996, not 1966. It was crazy. We ended up staying just friends and still keep in touch today but it should not have been an issue. And my Mom had friends that thought black people waiting outside on a bench downtown meant they were waiting to be picked up to go to jail (it makes no sense, I know, but I distinctly remember that). Not only that, but this was not the south but New England! People have to make an effort to get to know each other as people, not just as races but also respect the differences. Obama had a lot of white people vote for him and I think there are many of us white progressives who think the white racists are disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. the poll seemed to reveal that they dont think it will help the currently insured
So maybe that's whats going on. Maybe white folks are getting the message that it will bend the cost curve for EVERYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Makes sense and also explains....
.... the "Joe the Plumber" outrage that "taxing the rich" is wrong because they TOO will be rich one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. YES!! And when you ask them their plan for getting Rich....
like what's your business idea, what's your plan, did you invent something, what are you studying..9 out of 10 times I ask that...They have NO answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Helloooo! They're investing in GOLD!
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 09:06 AM by Clio the Leo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. The Answer Is Because They're White and American
and when they inevitably don't become rich, it's all the fault of minorities, immigrants, women, Gays, environmentalists, taxes, Liberals, the media, etc.

This is no small point. The key differences between us, and people in other industrialized nations, is that we all live under this fantasy that we too will be rich. This fantasy guides all of our decision making and influences policy. "We don't need a single payer health insurance system when we're all going to be wealthy some day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yeah that mindset is major part of the problem
far too many of these peole have bought in to this a trickle down fantasy that by protecting the the rich they are protecting themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missheidi Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. This white chick gets it...
but I'm not understanding why other people are being so idiotic about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. Hello.
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. They've been told by the Industry Giants, Palin and Co. that health care reform
is "welfare reform," and that the negras and brownies don't work and will be "stealing" money from it's rightful owner--the white man.

Sadly, the president and the Democrats framed this debate wrong from the beginning. They should have focused on what Michael Moore did brilliantly in 'Sicko'. Rather than focus on the narrative that we must insure the uninsured, Michael's narrative focused on those who *already have insurance* but have been denied coverage despite their premium/deductible payments.

Another frustrated fact that the Democrats failed to hit home is the reality that we're ALREADY PAYING for people who are uninsured, as well as those who are UNDERinsured. People fail to understand that when the sick/insured rely on the Emergency Room to provide their primary care or as a last resort, the cost of those visits get shifted onto those of us who, thankfully, aren't sick and/or don't rely heavily on our own health insurance due to preexisting conditions/illnesses.

I just don't understand why the Democrats allowed the message to get muddled and why the Republican talking points about government takeovers and killing grandma to flourish in the minds of average Americans. We cannot rely on the M$M because it's lazy and doesn't care about doing the right thing.

We have to hit back harder. We must learn to get in front of these Repuke talking points and narratives BEFORE they have time to take root in the minds of Americans.

I hope it's not too late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. The Frame Should Have Been That The Bill Is A Consumer Protection Bill
with subsidies for those that cannot afford the high cost of premiums. Framing it as consumer protection and repeatedly using that phrase would have made it clearer for more Americans and our incredibly stupid media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. IBTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. The "Herrenvolk Democracy" premise is that all white men are equal in potential
through the franchise and office-holding, it is not based on class, only "whiteness." Of course it is a myth, and always was, nearly without exception, David Crockett (who was a major celebrity) and Andrew Johnson excepted.

Try to read "Black Image in the White Mind" by George M. Frederickson, one of the most important books of intellectual history ever, in my opinion. Also read anything by Oakes on slavery. You'll get a pretty good picture real quick like, as we say down South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. Some of the comments in this thread have been brilliant.
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 06:18 PM by Number23
And I agree that for many, many whites, growing up in a society that treats you as The Chosen People breeds within them a sense of entitlement that is threatened every single time they see someone who is not a member of the Chosen Ones become successful or if there is any balancing of the scales from the powers that be -- even amongst many of the more "liberal" ones. We have seen this so many times throughout our history that this should be irrefutable.

Education and exposure are the only solutions. I'm really glad to see this topic get so much exposure in the media because I don't think it's a coincidence at all that the most vocal opponents of this legislature on BOTH sides of the aisle primarily hail from a single group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. yeah - it's ALL white people
:eyes:

give me a break.

The issue is the lack of education, not just the color of their skin.

Yes, it's uneducated WHITE people who are causing the problem, but it's as absurd to suggest it's all white people as it would be to make a similar statement about all members of any other race or ethnic group.

I'm an educated white person, as are my friends and family (and some of my friends don't have college degrees, but they don't fit the "uneducated" label well) - and they're all in favor of reforming the health system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. self-delete: should not have even bothered. nt
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 07:25 PM by CBR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
39. White privilege, falsied entitlement and a self-inflated sense of superiority.
For some, those three things causes a lack of empathy for others not of their skin tone. And when those three things are are put in jeopardy by change, violence is used for self-preservation. Any small attack on "privilege" and you get such things as separatism, the KKK and the Teabaggers.

A lack of education is only the tip of the iceberg. Social indoctrination is the key because is establishes behavior like this.

In order for some whites to change, you have to erase many centuries of programming that causes such a mind-set and behaviors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I agree and the first step is to not overreact to articles
such as this by screaming "racism"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. +1
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 07:29 PM by political_Dem
Actually this thread is good, because this aspect of society needs to be discussed. People need to listen, take notes and start to use this knowledge in order to work through the racial problems that affect all of us.

The aspect of white privilege is a biggie and should not be swept under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Totally agree...
I think it is very difficult to assess a privilege you were afforded when you don't feel as a direct benefactor. I think that is what some struggle with it. If you grew up low-income or middle class, it is like, "hey, I am not benefiting from anything here." White privilege is so intertwined with every aspect of society (values, norms, education, clothes) that it is not something easily tangible for many (myself included). It is something that I work on consistently, this also includes other societal privileges (e.g. heterosexuality).

I also think it is important to discuss how class and race interact. There are barriers in society based on class but I feel as though it is extremely dangerous to ignore racism under the banner of classism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. In fairness to most whites, they have little but contempt for poor whites, either.
So it is pretty unrealistic to expect them to be more benevolent toward low-income non-whites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. The misconceptions will persist until something is done about Fox News
the right wing's propaganda machine. I'm not sure how it's even legal to have a 24 hour news network that misleads people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
52. As a white person...
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 12:27 AM by Splinter Cell
I can't tell you why so many whites are so fucking ignorant. They want to be, it seems to me.

As far as white privilege, I can agree and disagree with that. I grew up in a middle class home, but my father worked himself nearly to death(massive heart attack, massive stroke) for everything he's ever had. His father as well. They didn't go to college, and I haven't either, but I don't consider us "uneducated".

My point is, nobody ever gave my father or grandfather anything. They didn't come from money. They just worked their asses off. I think, what it really comes down to is ignorance. There are simply people in the world that are willing to pull their weight, and people that are not for whatever reason they can think up. It applies to people of every background, race etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC