bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 05:31 PM
Original message |
Another Obama nominee withdraws because of the party of NO |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. GADAMN ! Use some more recess frigin appoinements !!! |
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Maybe she's withdrawing to be considered for USSC? n/t |
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Good call, I hope so. n/t |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I suspect that he is joking - if the Republicans will not confirm her |
|
for this job, they certainly will not confirm her for the USSC. I wish Obama would have recess appointed her, though that would not keep her there for long.
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. So it doesn't matter. |
|
He might be joking. But it might be a reality. None of us know.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. That is too bad..I hope |
|
Dawn Johnsen goes on to get an excellent job and someone worthy gets confirmed to the Office Of Legal Counsel.
|
denimgirly
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Why are the withdraws always the very little Progressives remaining? |
|
I notice that it is always people who tend to be more progressives. I understand the GOP would focus on that but i would imagine these progressives would know that and just hang in there...ah well...I understand America loves right corporate beliefs but wow.
|
Jakes Progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. If we can't make this happen, |
|
we don't stand much of a chance for a decent SC nominee. I predict middle of the road nominee, someone not as liberal or progressive as the judge he or she replaces. The end result will be a more conservative court.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
9. One more reason to nominate a STRONG LIBERAL SCOTUS justice! |
|
We need frickin' progressive BALANCE to support the political perspective of 60% of this country that is UNrepresented now in this administration!
|
political_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. This is the time for Dems to stop rolling over and playing dead. |
|
For the love of God, we need to get people who are willing to fight back against the RNC and mean it.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Correction: Another nominee withdraws because of the President of "Ok, if you say so." |
chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
12. More here as well (TPM) |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-09-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
14. No, it's not due to "the party of NO" but the present INACTION of "the party of CENTRISM." |
|
If President Obama wanted to push certain nominees through without debate, he'd wait and do a recess appointment.
Understood! The GOP is INSANE, however, you can't blame every damn thing on them ALONE.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |