LeftyAndProud60
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 09:09 PM
Original message |
The WSJ actually said something good about Obama's work on Nukes |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Makes me want to box Sarah Palin. |
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I wonder what color her face will go if she reads it. |
|
I think she said, recently, that she read the WSJ.
I hope her face goes beet red and she feels like an idiot, if that's possible.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think she's prolly reading the want ads in the WSJ. tee hee hee |
|
Wasilla Stately Journal.
She may not know there are two.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Got this much out of it..the rest you have to subscribe to.. |
|
"The Obama administration's nuclear posture review, together with the new START treaty with Russia, will strengthen American security and reinforce the nation's global leadership. This is an impressive achievement for at least four reasons.
First, each of these initiatives (along with this week's nuclear security summit) are modest and incremental steps toward reducing the nuclear threat. But taken together, their impact could be transformational, spurring a shift in American nuclear strategy from an outmoded Cold War focus on deterring a Russian-American nuclear conflict ..."
|
woolldog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
5. couldn't read the article.... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |