Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton: I was wrong to listen to Rubin and Summers' advice against regulating derivatives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 07:49 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton: I was wrong to listen to Rubin and Summers' advice against regulating derivatives
Clinton should have expanded his second-thoughts to include any and all advice given to him to implement NAFTA and to help grant China MFN status.



http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/04/clinton-rubin-and-summers-gave-me-wrong-advice-on-derivatives-and-i-was-wrong-to-take-it.html

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives*

April 17, 2010 7:20 PM

In my EXCLUSIVE “This Week” interview, I asked former President Bill Clinton if he thought he got bad advice on regulating complex financial instruments known as derivatives from his former Treasury Secretaries, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. He acknowledged that he was wrong to take the advice of those advising him against regulating derivatives.

“On derivatives, yeah I think they were wrong and I think I was wrong to take because the argument on derivatives was that these things are expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of investors will buy them and they don’t need any extra protection, and any extra transparency. The money they’re putting up guarantees them transparency,” Clinton told me.

snip

The former President also said he was also wrong about understanding the consequences if the derivatives market tanked. “The most important flaw was even if less than 1 percent of the total investment community is involved in derivative exchanges, so much money was involved that if they went bad, they could affect a 100 percent of the investments, and indeed a 100 percent of the citizens in countries, not investors, and I was wrong about that.”

Clinton also blamed the Bush administration for scaling back on policing the financial industry. “I think what happened was the SEC and the whole regulatory apparatus after I left office was just let go.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Glad Bill is throwing Rubin and Summers under the bus, but it's a bit late Bill
Although, Bill could be giving a signal to Obama to fire Summers and stop listening to Rubin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
activa8tr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I'm hoping that's the message getting through
I'm at such a loss as to why Rubin is being listened to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Still, it is important
that Bill Clinton admitted he was wrong on Rubin, the 800 lb elephant in Clinton's living room. Maybe if Clinton remain president he would have stopped the deregulations of Wall Street. It was Bush's laissez-faire deregulations that caused the Wall St. meltdown of '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, Obama said he'll veto a bill without strong derivatives regulations
So maybe we should wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Guernica
Has anyone thought to do an impression of Guernica using color?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. As I understand it, from Simon Schama's excellent book "The Power of Art"
there had been some people who felt Guernica should include color in order to get the power of the piece over more strongly but Picasso resisted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm seeing shades of blood red in my head.
Maybe browns, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC