Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Kagan isn't liberal enough.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 07:27 AM
Original message
If Kagan isn't liberal enough.....
No problem, we can replace her in 25 - 30 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. huzzah!!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. better start with electing a more liberal president except you need more voters
who agree with the left positions and are less moderate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not less moderate, less right wing
Let me be very clear here. The opposition to equal rights for all minorities is a right wing position, not 'moderate' in any way. On a world wide basis, it is wildly conservative and frankly, backward, the realm of theocracies and not democracies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thought we had
Ya know, a guy that thought that torture was wrong, not a guy that "reserved the right" to approve torture in the future, much less "had their backs" as long as they committed torture within the "four corners" of the existing policies.

A guy that was going to close Gitmo, not just give it a change of address..... someday.

A guy that was going to end indefinite detentions, not create a more structure approach to sustain them.


A guy that believed that openness in government was a defining feature of our government, not a guy that thought the SecDef ought to be able to classify photos because they were embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC