Why the younger generation doesn't care about the debate over the latest Supreme Court nominee.

[Clintonista2]

http://www.slate.com/id/2255104?wpisrc=xs_wp_0001

As the Elena Kagan Bore'Em to Death Tour rolls on into Memorial Day weekend, it's clear that almost no narrative about her is going to stick. A CBS poll released today shows that almost three weeks after her nomination for the Supreme Court, 72 percent of Americans have yet to form an opinion on her. And since she's all but disappeared from the front pages, it's not clear how we're going to get to know her better before the confirmation hearings, which are scheduled for the end of June. The meta-narrative about Kagan seems to be that there is no meta-narrative about Kagan. This doubtless makes the White House very happy.

== ==

Young people reading Robin Givhan's article on Kagan's scandalously open knees think they're reading something hilarious from their grandparents' stack of dating magazines from the 1950s. When they hear us yelping about racial diversity at the court, they think about the fact that their classrooms are already incredibly diverse and their Facebook friendships span continents. When they hear us shrieking over women's softball, they shake their Title IX heads and figure we're just idiots for thinking straight women don't play sports. And when they hear us whispering behind our hands about whether someone is gay, most of them tell me they think we're just freaking idiots. Just as they embody Barack Obama's post-racial America, they identify almost completely with Kagan's post-gender America—in which womanhood simply isn't defined by skirts, babies, or boyfriends anymore.

Never has my own obsolescence thrilled me more. As those of us in the media continue to relitigate the 1960s—from the Civil Rights Act to Vietnam—the people who will live through Kagan's decades-long tenure at the court have moved on. The debate over identity politics will take on new meaning over the next few decades, I'm sure. But it probably won't mean bickering about Kagan's color, race, or gender. What I hear on these call-in shows is pretty much what recent polling of the millenials reflects: They care passionately about the economy, and they are ambivalent about the government. They are far more tolerant than their parents about race and sexual choice; they aren't so in love with the idea of marriage; and religion just isn't as big an issue as we think it is. And they seem to be telling me, over and over again, that when it comes to a Supreme Court nomination, they value competence and intelligence over the check-the-box identity politics.
== ==
Full article...http://www.slate.com/id/2255104?wpisrc=xs_wp_0001

[Captain Hilts]

1. Let's have academic diversity: some justices that, even once,attended a state university. nt

[Clintonista2]

3. Agreed

[Captain Hilts]

4. The fights for civil rights - for race and sex - are a Thing of the Past for the young.

They don't realize how tenuous those rights are.

[Captain Hilts]

2. And she is too short to cross her legs in a chair. As in the photograph in Givhan's column. nt

[valerief]

5. Let's have economic diversity. I know. Let's have a middle class! nt

[Jennicut]

6. This article perfectly sums up how I feel about the ridiculousness

of whether Kagan's sexual orientation matters or not. I am not a millenial but I am a younger Gen Xer at 34. And most people my age and younger just don't get caught up in all of this stuff. Some of the Moms I know work, some of us don't. Some of my friends are married with kids and some aren't. And none of us really care if someone we know turns out to be gay (like my husband's friend from high school). We do get shocked when one of our friends from college does turn out to be a pornstar, however (yes, it is true and no I won't give out her website).