Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The promised speedy wind-down is a farce... which is fine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:25 AM
Original message
The promised speedy wind-down is a farce... which is fine
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 11:52 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
If the policy is bad then the policy is bad... no further analysis needed.

If the policy is good then the speedy commencement of withdrawal is absurd.

If we have a vital national interest in play then that interest should be pursued with seriousness.

Sending a bunch of men and material to Afghanistan and bringing them right back is ridiculous and not going to happen.

Our geo-strategic and/or moral interests are not going to be served by a fly-by policy. Our presence has little weight without commitment.

The whole, We are going and pulling out in 18 months thing is thrown out there as a sop to the dumbest people on Earth because... hey, it might work on a few folks. It makes no sense if it's true and it's offensive if just a casual instance of the dreaded okey-doke.

You cannot say we are pursuing the very safety of the nation then, as a sop to the most credulous war opponents, say we aren't pursuing it very hard.

It's insulting. All that was promised was that there will be a minor troop reduction of some sort in the medium term marking the beginning of a wholly undefined withdrawal that might take 100 years. And that's all that could be promised because our claimed vital concerns are strategic, not tactical, That shit takes time and perseverance.

Tossing out the bone of a bogus and rhetorical wind-down that does not (and must not) exist in the fine print makes the speech as dignified as an infomercial.

If the policy is good then defend it without childish mid-direction. Tell the truth... that the policy is incoherent if we are not in it for the long-haul with success (permanently changing aspects of the whole nature of Afghanistan and Pakistan) as a precondition of withdrawal.

DEFEND THE REAL POLICY.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well we knew that was coming
The one thing you could have admitted was good. Have to deny it, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Why on Earth would I, or could I, have "admitted" the speedy-draw-down lie is good? You seem to have mistaken me for a categorical opponent of US action in Afghanistan despite the fact that I have never said anything of the sort.


My stance on this whole matter has been that if we have compelling security and/or moral interests then they should be pursued with seriousness.

I am an agnostic on that because I cannot know our intentions for action vis-a-vis Pakistan. If the policy is important then its important.

I can trust the president on whether it is important.

But that does not mean it is okay to play dumb-ass politics with the thing... trying to please all people in ways that will simply have the result of pissing off all people.

If I am left to trust the president on this, as we all are, then his speech and policy should be trustworthy, not some scam along the lines of the fine print on a credit card balance-transfer check.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Why is it a "farce?"
Are you saying it can't be done? Or that Obama is part of the neocon cabal? Or Obama wants to do it and is mistaken that it can be done? Or Obama is just lying and saying it when he has not intention of doing it?

He said it's to ended responsibly. Obviously these wars cannot be just ended right away. Bush created a mess in both places.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I think it is you who acts like they know everything
but just possibly.. doesn't know what they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very good way to put it
There is something very incoherent with initiating escalation because of all these dire reason, then promising a quick withdrawal when no one knows what will happen in 3 years. I tend to have thought it was only political rhetoric tossed out there to pacify, well, people like me. It didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. What IS the "real policy", exactly?
Wanna balk at a firm timeline because of variables? I'm ok with that...as long as I know you have an actual objective.


What IS our specific objective in Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. So suggesting we might leave after 10 YEARS there is a rhetorical device?
You've created a nice straw-man argument there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is going to be easy peasy. We are America and we got Obama.
Forget about history. The Taliban is going to be throwing rose petals faster than you can say SHAZAAM.

You know we have got an exit strategy. That is going to do it. Uh huh.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. What did you think of what Clinton, Mullens and Gates said during the hearing today?
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 01:29 PM by Clio the Leo
That's a serious question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC