Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Threatens veto if Senate curbs EPA climate power.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:22 PM
Original message
Obama Threatens veto if Senate curbs EPA climate power.
(I believe this would be some of that "showing leadership" I've heard mentioned)

W.House eyes veto if Senate curbs EPA climate power

WASHINGTON June 8 (Reuters) - The White House on Tuesday threatened a presidential veto if the Senate passes a measure to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of its authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, is leading an effort against looming EPA regulation and has 40 co-sponsors for the bill, which is set for a vote on Thursday.

President Barack Obama wants the EPA to have powers to set limits on industrial emissions and other pollutants if Congress fails to enact its own legislation to fight climate change. Such a bill passed the U.S. House of Representatives a year ago but a similar effort is bogged down in the Senate.

Congressional and private-sector sources said on Monday the Murkowski plan would fail unless it found new last-minute support.

White House officials have been fighting Murkowski's efforts for months. Obama is under international pressure to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, blamed for heating the earth, while the the United Nations attempts to agree on a pact that would curb emissions worldwide.

"If the President is presented with this Resolution of Disapproval, which would seriously disrupt EPA's ability to address the threat of GHG pollution, as well as the multi-agency Federal GHG and fuel economy program, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the Resolution," the White House said in a statement on Tuesday.

(Reporting by Jeff Mason, editing by Jackie Frank)

http://af.reuters.com/article/metalsNews/idAFN0826461920100608


Statement from the White House here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/sap_111/sapsjr26s_20100608.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder how many of the co-sponsors aren't (officially) Republicans? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Three - Landrieu, Ben Nelson and Blanche lincoln
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. The veto threat! Well, that's about as clear as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't just say it, do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're aware that a bill has to make it to his desk first, right?
He can't just veto ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Of course he can, and he would have if he wasn't such a sell-out.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's too funny
I'm also totally pissed that he hasn't swam down to the oil gusher and plugged it personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. And well he should.
This is one promise he needs to keep if the need arises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, fuck 'em if they can't handle
EPA's Climate power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. The fact that this amendment is even being considered underscore's Harry Reid's incompetence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC